Zerlina Maxwell; women don’t need guns to prevent rape

| March 6, 2013

Zerlina Maxwell

Zerlina Maxwell, a Democrat strategist, told some folks on Fox news last night that women don’t need guns to prevent rape – they only need to convince men not to rape them. From the Washington Times;

“I want women to be able to protect themselves, yes, but I want women to not be in this situation,” she said.

“We can prevent rape by telling men not to commit it,” she repeated. “If firearms were the answer, then the military would be the safest place for women and it’s not.”

Again with the “military all carrying guns” bullshit. For one thing, I’m not buying this shit about all of the men in the military are preying on women. I think these anti-war idiots are using this to demean the troops because we’re never supposed to question rape. They tried to call the troops baby-killers, they’ve tried the “crazy vet” thing that worked so well in the 70s and 80s and neither of those worked, so now they’re trying to make everyone in uniform out to be a rapist. I’m not saying rape doesn’t happen, but it doesn’t happen as often as we’re led to believe.

And if talking men into not raping would work so well, why haven’t the laws and all of the Law & Order: SVU episodes worked?

Yeah, I think there’s a war against women and it’s coming from the ideological Left who don’t mind that women might die because of their opposition to guns.

Category: Gun Grabbing Fascists

67 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Rob

Can we have a “Stupidest comment about women not needing guns” contest?

FatCircles0311

More non veteran turds talking about the military like they personally know. It’s like those idiots that tout how there shouldn’t have been a mass shooting at Ft. Hood because the military has weapons on it.

PintoNag

Thanks, babe. I’ll keep my guns.

I never have formed a good verbal arguement on why someone who intends to hurt me shouldn’t. I just intend to stop them if they try.

BCousins

I would like to listen to and watch her talk her way out of a rape. It won’t happen. There’s enough stupid there to rank its own zip code.

Twist

HALT or I will be forced to yell HALT again.

royh

And if telling people not to do bad things worked the Dems would have no base at all.

ohio

C3PO had a much better grip on reality! This woman is giving stupidity a good name.

EX-PH2

When you whimper ‘please don’t hurt me’, your attacker only hears ‘please hurt me’.

Do we have to go back to the 1970s and women’s self-defense and safety classes all over again? After all the crap we’ve been through already to get rid of this asinine attitude, we have to start again?

I hate to say this — I would NEVER wish it on anyone, EVER — but I hope she gets an up-close-and-personal education on being assaulted.

I just do NOT believe this attitude. Where in the blue-eyed world is this coming from?

jhstuart

OMG! Why didn’t someone think of trying to talk to Hitler, Mao, Pol Pot and Stalin?

John11b

Anyone who thinks they can talk their way out of ANY situation has clearly never been in a situation where real (deadly or otherwise) consequences were a potential outcome.

Lucky

Idk about you, but guns would be a pretty big deterrent, ask the bank robber in Missouri who was shot in the fucking face. That whole liberal defense that, ‘Cops carry guns so citizens won’t have to’ is bullshit. I want to see quantifiable, actionable data to prove that. If there is no data, go find a gun, give it a blowjob, and let us have all the oxygen. This, and that fat hag in California who lectured the rape victim piss me off beyond belief

MCPO NYC USN (Ret.)

ATTENTION ALL MEN IN THE USA:

Do not rape women!

I thank you in advance for your full cooperation in this matter.

MCPO NYC USN (Ret.)

Probelm solved!

Someone put me in for the Nobel Peace Prize for “Erradication of Woman Rape in the USA”.

M. Oleman, Corporal Obvious

Why stop at DO NOT RAPE WOMEN! How about DO NOT COMMIT ANY CRIMES! IT’s all so easy yet I can’t wrap my head around it.

Hondo

Someone should clue Ms. Maxwell in on this little fact of life: singing “Kumbaya” doesn’t always work.

DaveO

1. Prognazis are pro-rape.

2. Democrats are pro-rape.

jonace

I wonder if she ever heard of Ted Bundy? Her strategy is very flawed.

JBS

If she is a strategist for the Demolibs, then maybe our side will be ok. And if her influence has rubbed off on the party, then we know why we are in this situation. She’s propably partially to blame for sequestration.

The Lurker Formerly Known As Curt

Is it just me…I saw her picture and said “ooh, pretty” and then I read the story…the pretty was diminished by teh stupid…

Dumbass…

NHSparky

Yo, Zerlina, your strategy isn’t going to work, and you know why?

Cause you didn’t say, “Pretty please with a fucking cherry on top.”

I’m not saying rape doesn’t happen, but it doesn’t happen as often as we’re led to believe.

True dat. 18-19 Y/O E-2 gettin a little sumthin-sumthin in the fan room underway get caught, girl cries rape, guy gets slammed, girl skates. Maybe not quite THAT simple, but it has happened in much the same circumstances. Only maybe twice in my time in did I know of/hear of a woman getting raped by a sailor in my command where it was cut-and-dried he fucking did it.

Consider in the military justice system that it’s quite the opposite in most circumstances of the civilian system–guilty until proven innocent, and even then you can still get slammed at Mast/Art. 15.

Lucky

Hey MCPO, that means your tranny indulgences are still good to go

MCPO NYC USN (Ret.)

YO Lucky … like what the?

We don’t call them trannies anymore … that is offensive!

Lucky

Hahahaha ok ok, gender confused, gender neutral…? What do you call a Thai ladyboy? Hahahaha jp

UpNorth

Zerlina Maxwell and Sen. Evie Hudak D-Stupidity, are neck and neck for dumbest comment of 2013. Not to despair, I’m sure that another brain dead dem will open his/her yap and, at the least, equal this monumental stupidity.

DaveO

The prognazis must think having women advocate inviting and enjoying rape is somehow better, somehow socially acceptable, than men advocating it.

MCPO NYC USN (Ret.)

Pretty!

Lucky

Hahahaha! MCPO, if you ever find yourself in Northern VA, look me up, we will grab cigars!

USMCE8Ret

I’ll be selling shirts on CafePress that are red in color and bold white letters that reads “DON’T RAPE ME”. They’ll sell for about $19.95 and are good for either men or women. (They come in smaller sizes for your pets, too.)

Veritas Omnia Vincit

Now if this was an older white guy whose party affiliation started with an R and said something this monumentally stupid regarding rape, how long do you suppose before said idiot had to resign or end their campaign?

Who knew that all it took to stop a demented rapist were the words, “dude don’t rape me!”?

Sh1t I bet police forces all over the nation are printing up flyers even as we speak….”please don’t kill me Mr. Home Invader” “Don’t Mug me Dude” along with the ever popular “Don’t tase me bro!”

Common Sense

I’m still waiting for the Left to parade a real rape victim around who says “I’m glad I didn’t have a gun to protect myself”. I’ll be waiting until hell freezes over because there is no such person.

Eagle Keeper

“OUR SOCIETY has reached a pinnacle of self-expression and respect for individuality rare or unmatched in history. Our entire popular culture — from fashion magazines to the cinema — positively screams the matchless worth of the individual, and glories in eccentricity, nonconformity, independent judgment, and self-determination. This enthusiasm is reflected in the prevalent notion that helping someone entails increasing that person’s “self-esteem”; that if a person properly values himself, he will naturally be a happy, productive, and, in some inexplicable fashion, responsible member of society.

“And yet, while people are encouraged to revel in their individuality and incalculable self-worth, the media and the law enforcement establishment continually advise us that, when confronted with the threat of lethal violence, we should not resist, but simply give the attacker what he wants. If the crime under consideration is rape, there is some notable waffling on this point, and the discussion quickly moves to how the woman can change her behavior to minimize the risk of rape, and the various ridiculous, non-lethal weapons she may acceptably carry, such as whistles, keys, mace or, that weapon which really sends shivers down a rapist’s spine, the portable cellular phone.

~ Jeff Snyder, “A Nation of Cowards”

Don’t resist. Don’t even scream. Just lay back and reason with the rapist, something like, “Now listen friend, you really don’t want to do this.”

68W58

Qualifications?

Rape, murder, arson, and rape.

You said rape twice.

I like rape.

Mel Brooks help us, we’ve gone beyond parody.

malclave

We can prevent rape by telling men not to commit it

So what she’s really saying is that the Sandy Hook massacre could have been prevented if only politicians had told people not to murder children?

EX-PH2

@33 – Congrats, malclave, you got the prize for the answer to the pop quiz question, and here it is:

What is the dumb-fuckingest thing you have heard a (potential) politician say, up to today?

OWB

These librtards seriously are insane! Reason doesn’t work with them any more successfully than it does on racist, home invaders or bank robbers, among others.

Wonder if they have a clue that they sound utterly stupid when they talk like this? If they have had success in preventing rape with this tact, guess they have encoutnered an entirely different class of rapist than the typical ones walking the streets and hiding in the shadows of this country.

Dear Ms. Maxwell: Your idea of telling a rapist to not commit rape will be just as effective as telling all other criminals to not commit crimes has been. You know, since, because, like, since you and your ilk have passed so many gun laws, gun violence has decreased, especially in places like Chicago. It has, right? (Oh, you really don’t know?) You only continue to sponsor additional laws which have no positive impact because you are delusional – about this topic, and several others.

That is all.

EX-PH2

I have an idea. Why don’t we just take Ms. Maxwell on a ride 50 years into the past in the Wayback machine, so that she can find out what it’s like to get mugged and raped at the bus stop?

Oh, wait — we don’t have to get into the Wayback machine. We can just drop her sorry ass off at a bus stop on Chicago’s south side. Maybe in the Englewood district. Or Chatham, Gage Park, 63rd and Stony Island. We’ll just pick a good spot and leave her on the sidewalk, and see how long she lasts.

2/17 Air Cav

What is this, a stupidity contest between Maxwell and Audrey Gibson?

2/17 Air Cav

@24. UpNorth. Sorry, I saw your comment late. We have a real horse race now for stupidest. As you say, “Zerlina Maxwell and Sen. Evie Hudak D-Stupidity are neck and neck” but Audrey Gibson is making a run at them as they near the wire. This is likely to be a photo finish and may be a 3-horse dead heat.

kp32

I’m sure that women are relieved that they simple have to request to not be raped vice the democrat’s other suggestion of urinating on themselves.

The normal solution is making more laws against it, as if there is some threshold of laws that a criminal will not cross… I’ll break 15 laws, but not 16, I have my limits don’t you know.

WOTN

How bout we do this:

Give every woman in a tossup district (50-50 R’s and D’s) the choice of
A) Attending a course by Ms Maxwell, and her group of 10 instructors paid no more than $500/day. Students will be given instruction in all the best methods of how to talk a rapist out of the crime.
B) Attending a handgun concealed carry and marksmanship class and loaned a Glock of the caliber of their choice, for as long as they carry it on a daily basis, qualify on an annual basis.

Courses are to be 5 days each.

Attendence records of the course will constitute a vote for the next politician of that district, of the lead instructor for it.

Let’s repeat this experiment in two high crime districts of Chicago. One district’s women get the CCL class and one gets the Maxwellintentions class. Changes in crimes stats to determine city wide gun/class laws. Most pertinent crime stats to be home invasions, rape, and murder, of the 2nd and 3rd years following the classes, compared to the last full year prior to class.

I’m thinking the gangs will soon be sayin’: “Don’t go down to X. Dem b****s be crazy. And they shoot back.”

WOTN

You know, let’s do that experiment on two college campuses, since reports say 25% of all college kids are raped. On one campus, all kids get a CCL class during indoc, and are required to carry for their entire education experience, while the other gets the Maxwellintentions course.

After 4 years, we can look at the impact on rapists in college.

UpNorth

@38. You’re right, it’s a 3-way race now. But, I’m comfortable in predicting that the field will get more crowded.

UpNorth

AirCav, I forgot, Maxine Waters said the the Sequester would cause 170 million people to lose their jobs. See, the field did get more crowded.

Hondo

UpNorth: yeah, I’d forgotten about that piece of idiocy from ol’ clueless Maxine.

That would be quite a trick, given that the BLS puts the current US civilian labor force (seasonally adjusted) at about 143.3 million for January 2013.

http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/surveymost?ln

(select the first report, “Employment Level – Civilian Labor Force”)

2/17 Air Cav

@43. We’re going to have to limit the entries, somehow. Otherwise, they’ll be packed onto the track like sardines and nobody will be able to move.

EX-PH2

Gentlemen, there may be a bump in the road to stupidest.

http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/03/06/17213403-gun-control-efforts-hit-senate-snag?lite

The Senate is having a problem getting gun control even discussed.

And one town has solved the problem of cops in schools at zero cost to taxpayers:

http://todaynews.today.com/_news/2013/03/06/17209597-town-puts-police-officers-in-schools-at-no-cost-to-taxpayers?lite&GT1=43001

Forward with the road to stupidest remarks contest.

EX-PH2

I do, however, nominate the Brooklyn Park, MD, school that decided to suspend the young boy for making a toy of his Poptart, described as (and I quote) a ‘brutally harmless rampage’.

How does one excuse using brutal, harmless and rampage this way? How can a rampage be both brutal AND harmless? What did I miss?

http://valorguardians.com/blog/?p=34442

USMCE8Ret

I think they need to make anger management classes mandatory for people who are thinking about committing rape.

Carry on.

EX-PH2

How about anger management classes for people who afraid of anger?

68W58

Star Parker says “eff you” Zerlina Maxwell: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMV1hNXt1JM&feature=youtu.be