Nationwide Reciprocity Bills Intro’ed

| March 10, 2026 | 4 Comments

 

If you’re gonna carry pretty

Keep your eyes on H.R. 645, the National Constitutional Carry Act.  Here is the money line:

“(a) No State or political subdivision of a State may impose a criminal or civil penalty on, or otherwise indirectly limit the carrying of firearms (including by imposing a financial or other barrier to entry) in public by residents or nonresidents of that State who are citizens of the United States and otherwise eligible to possess firearms under State and Federal law.

Basically that says if someone is able to legally own or have a firearm, they can carry it. Anywhere, even if a non-resident of a local state or jurisdiction.

The bill cites the decisions in Heller,  MacDonald, and Bruen (which address, in order, that individuals have the right to own guns, carry guns, and unless restrictions are historically valid, without restriction.

Now, we all know, that many states’ responses to Bruen was to pack on newer restrictions (many of which have already been struck down, some still wending their way through courts.) “Sure, you can own and carry a gun – unless you are in a defined public place but we’re defining ANY public place as restricted” sort of thing.

Basically, this would make ‘Constitutional Carry’ – if you are legally allowed to own a gun, you can carry it – the law of the land. Every state, including anti-gun states like Hawaii, Maryland, New York, Colorado  (and of course California), even possessions like Puerto Rico.

Thank Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) and

Mr. Massie (for himself, Ms. Boebert, Mr. Biggs of Arizona, Mr. Brecheen, Mr. Burchett, Mr. Burlison, Mr. Cline, Mr. Cloud, Mr. Collins, Mr. Crane, Mr. Gosar, Ms. Greene of Georgia, Mr. Harris of Maryland, Mr. Higgins of Louisiana, Mr. Langworthy, Mrs. Luna, Mrs. Miller of Illinois, Mr. Moore of Alabama, Mr. Moran, Mr. Ogles, Mr. Rose, Mr. Roy, Mr. Self, Mrs. Spartz, Ms. Tenney, Mr. Tiffany, Mr. Weber of Texas, Mr. Wied, Mr. Gill of Texas, and Mr. Harrigan) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary   Congress.gov

That’s the good news. The bad news? MAYBE it will make it out of committee, but in all honesty I doubt it. If it does – expect the usual weeping, wailing, predictions of “wild west, blood running in the streets” they have reliably trotted out since Florida started allowing general concealed carry 30 years ago.

They never seem to mention that most killings are committed by a very small number of criminals who disregard laws to begin with, or that most lethal shootings are suicides. It will still be anecdotal “my child was shot” (regardless of the “child” being a 19 year old TdA member doing a drug deal or similar.) Expect poison pill amendments, pearl-clutching – you know the routine.

It’d be nice if  I’m wrong, though.

Category: Crime, Guns, Politics

guest

4 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Toxic Deplorable B Woodman

This shouldn’t even be necessary, with Constitutional Federal law preemption. Yet here we are.
It’d be nice to see Shitcago, New Yawk, Hawaii, New Joisey, et al, be brought down (up?) a few pegs.

Not a Lawyer

Basically that says if someone is able to legally own or have a firearm, they can carry it. Anywhere, even if a non-resident of a local state or jurisdiction.

It doesn’t say that. It says:

the carrying of firearms (including by imposing a financial or other barrier to entry) in public

“Anywhere” would have zero chances of passing. Even “in public” is limiting. Many states even with constitutional carry laws have a number of places that firearms are prohibited. Certainly the Federal Government will prohibit carry in NPS Facility buildings, airports, military bases and court houses and so will states, along with a lengthy list of other places.

While a good step in the right direction, keep it real.

SFC D

Arizona carry laws seem to be working. Yes, there are limits (you can’t carry in bars, for example), and businesses have the option to not allow firearms if they so desire. The state will even provide the proper signage for free. Our local Walmart has signs that “request you do not carry openly” but they don’t ban it. But, I don’t think this bill has a snowball’s chance.

Old tanker

They couldn’t get national reciprocity passed, so I’m not going to hold my breath waiting for this one to go through and become law.

Don’t get me wrong, I’d love it if they did but I think there is a better chance oac will grow a brain and omar converting to Judaism than that law passing to go to Trump’s desk.

This is just political theater intended to pacify the 2nd amendment folks into thinking that politicians have our back. In short, nothing but smoke and mirrors, just like hope and change.

Last edited 2 hours ago by Old tanker