Tale of Two Tunnels
What’s the difference between the cartel tunnels between Mexico and The United States and the terror tunnels between Palestine and Israel?
The terror tunnels into Israel bring in terrorists that take human life immediately.
The cartel tunnels into the United States bring in drugs and criminality that ruin/take lives eventually.
Take home truth: Nothing good comes from secret tunnels from one country to another.
Of course, we Americans should not be concerned with the radical Islamist trends that are currently plaguing our allies in Europe and ally in the Middle East.
I’m sure a mass migration of Muslims will never come to our shores, and the tunnels on our southern border will never be used by terrorists.
We will never experience terror stabbing attacks like Israel deals with (except this one and that one).
We will never have mass rape mobs like European women experienced as they rang in the New Year in 2016. That is, as long as we decide sooner rather than later, that accepting tens of thousands of titillated Muslim men—that believe that women are property—is a horrible idea.
It would behoove the United States to consider seriously the ramifications of going the way of Europe and avoiding the migrant quagmire, but we won’t I am mildly pessimistic.
Oh, and the southern border is probably a significant issue too–and not just the tunnels underneath it.
Category: Terror War
There are many good Muslims and there are many bad Muslims. The trick on figuring out which is which is not to ask them but to research them. No audit trail, no entry. Plain and simple. Then, like our forefathers, make them assimilate into our culture not create third and fourth world roach traps that continue to degrade women in America. Trump is close to being on target.
Agreed. Unfortunately, the leftist counter-argument is that regardless of “no audit trail,” turning “asylum” seekers away is not compassionate.
Definitely a wicked problem with no easy solution.
Fill all of the tunnels with poisonous gas..that should at least slow them down!
But what about the environment? The gas might harm a protected earthworm species that we don’t know about.
Blood agents dissipate quickly and should be effective in an enclosed environment.
Accepting anybody without bulletproof bonafides is such a monumentally bad idea, I can’t believe that Obama and his ilk keep promoting it … with a straight face.
Unless, he really is trying to destroy the Republic. In which case, it makes perfect sense, I suppose.
Form over substance, it’s the essence of this administration. It’s more about perception than practical reality.
Viewed under that lens it’s easy to see why we ignore practical solutions in favor of appearances.
It’s why we’ve lost our minds over cake bakers, pizza makers and where to take a piss while doing nothing about the supposed JV team in the middle east….shiny objects are such a lovely distraction for the masses.
Of course there is one small difference, the only reason the cartels bring those drugs is to answer the high demand for product here in the United States.
One very uncomfortable reality here is that we as a nation love our drugs, illegal, prescription, alcohol we do so love to get high in the US…and of course we fight the drug war as an industry devoted to maintaining the status quot. There are no significant efforts to actually prosecute that war with any actual sense of winning the war. Instead it’s used to raise funds for local police forces through questionable seizure practices that should be an affront to every American’s sense of protection under the constitution from exactly that kind of government over reach….but we’ve become a nation that prefers the tranquility of servitude to the tumult of liberty.
Jefferson must be disgusted looking at what we’ve become.
If we were serious about the drug war we would tell foreign nations if they can’t control their drug lords we will through firebombing and defoliation of arable land that will result in the complete destruction of any area capable of growing drugs to import illegally into the country. If we’re not that serious about fighting the drug war why aren’t we considering the cost of it against the loss of personal liberties and determining a method to regulate these products to end both the violence and the tremendous waste of resources in a war we’ve no intention of winning.
There would be no supply if there were no demand. About the only thing the Hildebeast has ever said I agreed with was when she stated this on a trip to Mexico…and she promptly caught hell from Americans for interfering with their God-given (or so they apparently think) right to pharmaceuticals. We have never really wanted to stop drug use and have never really tried to do so, and the result is the morass of addiction and crime we created.