VOTE E-9
I know, I know, there are those among you veterans who can’t find it in your hearts to feel any love for senior NCO’s, especially first sergeants and sergeant majors. Actually, I never felt much warmth towards first sergeants either, because if they saw you idle for a single moment, they’d find a working detail for you. Sergeant majors, on the other hand, tended to be a bit more discriminatory in the way they wielded their exponentially greater power. I say this with some inside knowledge because after a first enlistment as a mouthy screw-up, never rising above E-4, I got my act together on my second enlistment and played by Army regs: I soldiered. I really did, knuckling down and getting serious about being a contributing member of the unit. It paid off in spades with TDY to Army schools, special assignments and rapid promotions to positions of responsibility. I became a battalion staff Chemical, Biological and Radiological warfare NCO, a CBR NCO. This, mind you, in spite of the fact that the only “D” I ever made in high school was in chemistry. Ah well, that is the United States Army way, is it not?
But back to the point: my position on the battalion staff gave me my first opportunity to watch a sergeant major in action. It became quickly apparent to me that the guy who really ran this battalion was that hard-nosed, crusty old (he had to be all of forty) fart who reigned and roared from just outside the battalion commander’s office. I was both impressed and intrigued, so I closely watched how this managerial process operated. Later as the CBR NCO for an Airborne brigade at Fort Bragg, I watched the process as it functioned at an even higher level. What became apparent to me was that sergeant majors were a force unto themselves, with an old-boy network that bridged the world. That was 1967 when the war in Vietnam was really getting hot; my sergeant major and my colonel both urged me to go to OCS. Thinking about it, I preferred a future as a wheeling-dealing sergeant major someday rather than as a dead Second Louie in ‘Nam. However I finally opted to be a G.I. Bill student and finish my degree, a move which parlayed into a pharmaceutical marketing career in the military market for the next thirty years where I had many opportunities to observe the special skills of these remarkable E-9 creatures of every service.
So why bring up all this? Because America now has some of these Army and Marine sergeant majors, Navy master chiefs and Air Force chief master sergeants, all pay grade E-9, who want to apply their formidable managerial skills to the operation of our totally screwed-up federal government. They believe they have the managerial savvy to go into Congress and displace some of those effete lawyers and show this nation what can happen when management is taken out of the hands of the congressional officer corps and given to some hard-nosed but fair military professionals who truly know how to manage. I believe they are right.
One of these candidates is Jim Kuiken, who’s running for a congressional seat in South Texas. Jim is a retired Marine Corps sergeant major with a personnel file for anyone to envy. He’s Force Recon, a term that immediately grabs respect from those in the inner circles of the military. For those of you reading this with no military knowledge, Force Recon are the select tough guys who parachute or swim in ahead of the landing or assault forces to provide commanders with vital knowledge of the developing battlefield. Once ashore, they operate behind the lines and engage the enemy where necessary, without all the air and artillery support available to more conventional units. That requires them to be extremely capable and self-sufficient. To become a leader of this elite force, Jim had to earn his Marine gold parachutists wings as well as a Navy diving badge, neither of which is awarded to the faint of heart or shirkers from danger. He served in combat in Iraq, earning his nation’s award for being wounded in battle, the Purple Heart. This is a South Texas congressional candidate with some cojónes mas grande, a qualification not readily apparent in the Texas Democratic congressman he seeks to replace.
Would this old soldier like to see a bunch of retired sergeant majors, master chiefs and chief master sergeants go into Congress to kick ass and take names? You bet your sweet butt I would. These are the managers and administrators who have kept our military operating on insufficient budgets and a shortages of manpower for decades. They know how to accomplish the impossible with the insufficient. Can they be ruthless? Yep, they sure as hell can and this is a nation begging for some ruthless, but well-intentioned, effective leadership. Can they stop all the stupid wasteful spending on inane government programs that our current congress won’t?
Well we won’t know that until we elect enough of them…
We need a bumper sticker that says, VOTE E-9.
Category: Veterans in politics
Great read. Vote E-9!
Less lawyers the better! Shakespeare had a great quote about that. I would trust the judgement and savvy of my local mechanic over the ass-clowns we have here in Connecticut! But we do have an ex-FBI agent,who, ironically ran our gubenortorial embarrasment-in-Chief out of office. So there is hope.
Grammar nazi mode ON: technically, it’s “sergeants major.”
We now return you to your regularly scheduled blog.
As a 2LT at the 82nd in ’63 I was blessed to be “trained” by a CSM and 1SG who both had combat blast stars and exhibited the management style you describe. Some of my fellow 2LT’s didn’t absorb this training to their later chagrin. I had a great career thanks to these gents and others like them.
Ironically Poe, in MN we are trying to vote OUT an E-9, and not having much luck.
Generally I think you are correct, although some Sergeants Major get real political within the system and lose sight of where they came from and act more like career ticket punching Officers.
All said even those type would be a damn sight better than the stooges in DC regardless.
The VA needs a crusty old CSM or a old fashioned battle hardened take no shit Colonel to grab it by the throat and clean house and make it work instead of political hacks we always get.
“For those of you reading this with no military knowledge, Force Recon are the select tough guys who…” C’mon. Everyone knows what Force Recon does. We’ve all watched Heartbreak Ridge! ;^)
Had a Command Master Chief that I hugely respected, Dave Purdy. He was also one of those who wouldn’t brook shirkers and anything not shipshape, but if you believed you were in the right, and were trying your damndest, he’d have your back when it counted.
I would’ve followed him anywhere, because he was honest and fair, and no sailor could’ve asked for anything more.
I, too, would love to see more senior NCO’s like that in Congress. We need people with those skill sets, with demonstrated success who know what leadership really means.
In the A.F. (I know, not really a military branch), E-9 is something of an insult. We used to have Chiefs and then we had E-9s. It was much better to be a Chief. E-9s were usually ROAD.
@3Poobah,I know it’s supposed to be “sergeants major” but it’s rather like “attorneys general” in that everyone knows what is technically correct but in general usage the rule is mostly ignored.
You mean that along with everything else, we are supposed to gracefull accept the destruction of the language just because it’s easier for everyone to misuse it rather than learn how to speak and write properly?
Aaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrgggggggh.
For the record, “sergeants major” makes no sense, which is why I think it was made up by some illiterate E-9 at the Academy to sound smart, because I remember when they started pressing that meme on people. But if “Sergeant Major” is a rank, then two or more people of that rank are Sergeant Majors. No one says “Sergeants First Class” do they?
We used to, Jonn. 😉
(Also for the record, in the case of plural of rank, I can live with it either way, but we always referred to PFC’s as “Privates First Class,” not “Private First Classes” or Private Firstes Class.”)
There are two types of CSMs/SGMs, just like there are two types of MSGs/1SGs…really good…and really bad.
Same applies to Field Grades and above.
The disparity widens the higher the rank.
Er, yeah. I know of one Sergeant Major that I would follow anywhere. I have no use for the rest I have encountered.
We had a Navy Chief Purdy with us in Afghanistan in 2006.