Infowars: bin Laden has been on ice for a decade
I thought Gordon Duff was a nutbag, but, he’s got nuthin’ on Alex Jones’ Infowars. Their writer Paul Joseph Watson claims that bin Laden’s body has been on ice for a decade waiting for the politically appropriate moment;
In April 2002, over nine years ago, Council on Foreign Relations member Steve R. Pieczenik, who served as Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under Henry Kissinger, Cyrus Vance, and James Baker, told the Alex Jones Show that Bin Laden had already been “dead for months”.
Pieczenik would be in a position to know such information, having worked directly with Bin Laden when the US was funding and arming the terror leader in an attempt to drive the Soviets out of Afghanistan in the late 70?s and early 80?s (a documented historical fact that talking heads in the corporate media are actually denying today in light of developments).
“I found out through my sources that he had had kidney disease. And as a physician, I knew that he had to have two dialysis machines and he was dying,” Pieczenik told Jones during the April 24, 2002 interview.
So, I guess the close 2004 election wasn’t reason enough to stage an event like last night’s. Or the inevitable losses by the respective sitting administrations of the 2006, 2008 or 2010 elections weren’t reason enough. But releasing the birth certificate and shutting up Donald Trump was somehow the imperative moment.
By the way, notice these ads in the right sidebar on the website;
Category: General Whackos, Oath Keepers, Ron Paul
So why didn’t the eeeeevil Darth Cheney and his sockpuppet Chimpy McBushitler thaw him out and use him to steal a third term?
Or has Obama really been ruling since 2001?
1). A Ron Paul add using the ranger tab is disgusting.
2). Why is it this HAS to be a conspiracy? Can we just dance a little jig say “yay he’s dead” and get on with the business at hand?
Teh crazy is strong with this one…..
Well, I really don’t put much stock in what they say over there. Sometimes they are pretty good, but for the most part, everything is a CIA or Mossad plot being controlled by Israel. I do mean everything.
I agree with DOC, why does everything have to be somekind of conspiracy? I get why you all don’t care for Alex Jones and Ron Paul, frankly I don’t care much for them myself, but honestly the “idea” of the Oathkeepers seems like a good “idea”(there’s that word again). Could someone explain the problem to me, just wondering. Plus I just finished reading Tom Kratman’s “State of Disobedience”. I read all things Ringo/Kratman, BAEN publishing.
Dirty Al; We’ve done battle with Oath keepers in the past. They supported Adam Kokesh of IVAW as well as other IVAW members and we’ve had reports of them campaigning for Kokesh. Like you said, I was once tempted to join Oath Keepers because of the “idea”. But Stuart Rhodes, the founder of oath keepers, was a Ron Paul staffer and quoted Ron Paul’s support of kokesh as a reason to allow IVAW members in OKs. I also won’t support Rand Paul because he endorsed Kokesh. Paul sent us a statement once in which he tried to explain that Kokesh ambushed him, but watch the video and see for yourself if it looks like an ambush.
And, oh, yeah, we found a phony on their board of directors.
Lets see….Ron Paul? flat ass *goofy*! Alex Jones? Oh yea…Mister “There is a methane gas bubble set to go off at 3AM in the Gulf of Mexico(DW Horizon)and cause a gigantic tsunami that’s going to wipe out the Gulf Coast region” Alex Jones.
This is all really weird. Alex Jones is a truther. Not just any truther, but the grandaddy of all 9/11-was-an-inside-job conspiracy theorists.
It makes one wonder–if Osama was an innocent man, why then was he killed nine years ago? If the “official theory” is actually a cover story, why would they kill an innocent man nine years ago and keep him in a freezer? And why wouldn’t Bush have taken the credit?
It is futile to try to understand the ravings of a lunatic.
It kind of reminds me of people who claim that the Bush Administration planned the 9/11 attacks as a pretext to invade Iraq. My question: why then didn’t they make up a better story? Why was it a bunch of Saudis being harbored in Afghanistan? Why not, say, I dunno…a bunch of FRIGGIN’ IRAQIS? If the people who invent the story are the same people who are planning on taking us to war for oil, why then can’t they make up a better story?
Nope, we went to war in Afghanistan instead, and Afghanistan’s total oil production in 2009 was zero barrels. I just checked the CIA world fact book. Somebody ought to hire a better cover story writer.