New NASA contract available

Yes, you could become a NASA contractor. Although, to be fair, it’s not exactly a common specialty.
NASA is looking for potentially a new Vomit Comet supplier.
The Vomit Comet – what a name. I refer, of course, to the planes on which aspiring astronauts were lofted into the sky, and at the top of their trajectories, their speeds matched the pull of gravity to make them weightless. Might only be for a few seconds, but it gave them a taste of zero-G. And of their previous meal, no doubt, hence the plane’s nickname. We all saw it in “The Right Stuff” or read about it in the parent book, right?
While a single private company has handled these zero-G flights for NASA for years, a new contract solicitation shows the agency is once again inviting competitors to bid for the work, with the possibility of providing new solutions for a decades-old requirement.
NASA is interested in flexible, scalable, and novel operational concepts with the potential to help NASA expand access to reduced-gravity environments and accelerate space technology readiness.”
The current supplier, Zero-G, has been at this a while.
That’s the Florida-based Zero-G corporation, which offers parabolic flights on a retrofitted Boeing 727-200 dubbed ‘G-Force One.’ On the standard 90-minute flight the company offers, the aircraft will hit an altitude of 24,000 feet before beginning a steep climb at a 45-degree angle into a parabola that peaks around 32,000 feet. During the maneuver, passengers pull 1.8 Gs, according to the company; near the crest of the arc, the low-gravity phase begins, creating roughly half a minute of weightlessness.
G-Force One completes 15 parabola maneuvers in a single flight.
Think it’s for NASA only? Guess again.
While Zero-G offers separate rates for research flights, individuals ages eight and up can have the full experience for $8,900 per person, or $295,000 for the full 28-seat plane, plus a dedicated photographer.
Photographer? Man, I finally read of a job I might want to do when I grow up and I’m too old. As of now, Zero-G is the only authorized parabolic flight supplier.
Vomit Comet history began with a Convair C-131 Samaritan, a militarized version of a twin-engine passenger aircraft originally used by the Air Force for VIP transport and medical evacuation (MEDEVAC) missions. The service began using the planes to simulate zero gravity in 1957, and NASA took over the work in 1973.
Eventually, a Boeing KC-135 Stratotanker, a type that first went into USAF service in 1957 and variants of which are still used for aerial refueling today, became the new Vomit Comet. One of the KC-135As that served in this role reportedly executed more than 58,000 parabolas and played a key role in filming for the blockbuster “Apollo 13.”
Retired…not because 58,000 parabolas strained the plane, but because routine maintenance was too expensive. The plane was otherwise fine. Man, Boeing made the 707s tough.
A C-9B (DC-9) that NASA acquired subsequently took over the role for about a decade before it too was put out to pasture. Vomit Comet duties were then fully turned over to the private sector.
Eligible contractors must be capable of providing two or more parabolic maneuver types per flight to simulate a range of gravity conditions, including microgravity, and Lunar and Martian gravity, among others. Their platforms need to be capable of sustaining each gravity level for at least 10 seconds, though 30 seconds or better is preferred. TWZ
Fun article. Makes you realize how good our suppliers like Boeing and McDonnell (yeah, they may be one company now but they used to be rivals) really were.
Category: Movie Magic, NASA





The 707/135 was designed like an anvil pretty much unbreakable. Those operated by SAC were NOT rode hard and put up wet. Thats why the re-engined ones are still performing well today.
Contrast it with the 737 Max and you kind of wonder where everything went sideways.
Yep, most of the SAC birds spent their time standing on alert, only have around a tenth or so of the hours their 707 counterparts had.
End of June 1999. I was assigned to the 93 ACW (E-8C Joint-STARS) and we had been forward deployed to Frankfurt to support NATO ops in Kosovo for several months. As ALLIED FORCE wound down, and we were being redeployed to home drome in Georgia. Someone hatched a plan that we would all come home at the same time Ops, Maintenance, support, and planes. We had more crews deployed than planes and a big portion of our maintenance footprint. We’d only been operational for about 2 years and had only taken delivery of a handful of our “new” airplanes from Northrop Grumman. I say “new” as we had stuffed all the mission avionics in used airplanes.
The redeployment plan was each of our birds took off in conjunction with a pair of R model tankers who provided us with 25,000 pounds each of JP8. Additionally the tankers carried a bunch of our support equipment and baggage and extra crew and maintainers support troops. As a result, everyone got to come home with all our stuff and landed back home within a couple hour window.
Our deployed birds had originally rolled off Boeing’s production line between 1961 and 1964. They had between 51000 and 56000 hours on the airframes. I came home onboard one of the KC-135s. I took the opportunity to look at the aircraft forms. It rolled out of Boeing in the same 61-64 time frame as our aircraft and it logged a little over 13,000 hours on the airframe AND it had re-engined with new CFM-56 turbofan engines a few years prior.
My family attended the Seattle Seafair Gold Cup hydroplane races every year. In 1955, and just a kid, I witnessed Tex Johnson barrel roll the new 707 over Seattle’s Lake Washington during the Gold Cup. My dad went nuts, so my brothers and I did too. Much later I came to understand what a feat this was. It was quite the plane.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaA7kPfC5Hk#:~:text=Seattle's%201955%20Seafair%20and%20Gold%20Cup%20Hydroplane,on%20Lake%20Washington%20on%20August%206%2C%201955.
I bet that was an extremely slow roll.
Knew a former pilot/stew couple who flew many years with Continental before the big strike – they both swore a Continental pilot on a red-eye flight told his copilot he could roll a 727 such that the mostly sleeping passengers would never notice – and then proceeded to do so. No one noticed, but the copilot turned the pilot in for pulling a grossly dangerous maneuver, and the pilot was fired.
Every time I fall out of bed I experience a brief moment of zero G.
Heh.
I was lucky enough to experience some weightlessness.
I was on a P-3 mission en route to station and I went aft to talk to one of the guys working with me. As I was talking to him, the autopilot decided it didn’t want to be at 29,000 feet and it started to dive. I didn’t hit the overhead. I just hung there in the air. One of my crewmates was in the galley working on some gear and he was also floating, along with the equipment.
My crew chief was sitting down next to where I was and I can still the expression of wonder on his face.
While floating there for, I don’t know, maybe 15-20 seconds, I remember thinking “well, if this plane suddenly stops, I’m going to continue forward at about 300 knots.” No fear. I didn’t feel any fear, strangely enough, until the plane leveled out.
That day, we were lucky to have on board who I consider the best pilot I ever saw. His nickname was “the Greaseman”. Lots of pilots would have reacted instinctively and yanked the yolk into their belly. Not this guy. He pulled it back nice and easy. It was an awesome experience.
Double E ticket ride. In our P-3 we would fly a series of rolls, yaws and yes, pitches to compensate the MAD to the aircraft’s magnetic field. Big fun back in the galley when the negative G’s hit.