$200 mill crash an Alaska explained

The Air Force lost an F-35 in Alaska in January at Eielson Air Base. An accident report is blaming ice in the landing gear for the crash.
“After initial takeoff, the MA’s [mishap aircraft’s] nose landing gear (NLG) did not retract properly due to hydraulic fluid contaminated with water that froze, preventing full strut extension and resulting in the NLG being canted to the left. After running initial checklists, the NLG was still turned approximately 17 degrees to the left,” the report’s executive summary explains. “The MP [mishap pilot] initiated a conference call with Lockheed Martin engineers through the on-duty supervisor of flying (SOF). The MA held for approximately 50 minutes while the team developed a plan of action.”
I am not a flier, nor did I say at a Holiday Inn Express last night, but I have done a bit of time on two-wheeled stuff and I just have to assume landing with your nose wheel pointed off thataway almost 20 degrees cannot end well.
“The MP accomplished two touch-and-go landings attempting to recenter the NLG wheel. While both attempts failed to center the NLG wheel, the right main landing gear (MLG) strut and then left MLG strut did not fully extend after takeoff due to ice forming inside the strut,” it continues.
So the pilot tried twice to partially land and bounce the nose gear enough to try and break it loose and straight? To me that sounds like some very good pilot skills.
“After the second touch-and-go, all valid Weight on Wheels (WoW) sensors indicated the MA was on the ground, and the MA transitioned to the ‘on ground’ flight control law (i.e., automated ground-operation mode causing the MA to operate as though it was on the ground when flying). However, because it was actually airborne, the MA was uncontrollable. The pilot successfully ejected and emergency responders were at the scene within a minute.”
Planes have had automated landings for decades, you would think the failsafes would prevent the plane from deciding “yup, I’m on the ground” when it’s not?
The report separately notes that the F-35 flew upward after the pilot ejected and reached an altitude of 3,205 feet mean sea
level (MSL), or 2,665 feet above ground level (AGL), before it stalled and fell back to Earth. This helps explain the vertical descent seen in the viral video. The report says the aircraft was already pitched up 30 to 40 degrees, and was in a 38-degree bank to the left, when the pilot punched out.“The accident investigation board (AIB) president found, by a preponderance of the evidence, the cause of the mishap was hydraulic fluid contaminated by water that froze in the NLG and MLG struts. The ice prevented the struts from full extension that led the WoW sensors to declare the MA was on the ground when it was airborne,” the report adds.
Alaska in January, ice forming – nothing unexpected here but the contamination.
“Additionally, the AIB president found, by a preponderance of the evidence, that crew decision making including those on the in-flight conference call, lack of oversight for the Hazardous Materials program, and lack of adherence to maintenance procedures for hydraulic servicing were substantially contributing factors.” TWZ (formerly The War Zone)
Uh oh…$196,500,000 lost due to that last list of issues? The aircraft alone is over $110 million Expect heads to roll.
Category: "Your Tax Dollars At Work", Air Force





Oops, my bad. Can I put in for some leave now?
Insert commercial tag line… Wanna get away?
Weight on Wheels switches are safety devices that prevent certain functions from being armed (weapons, landing gear retract switches, things like that) when the bird is on the ground.
Interestingly, one of the things usually disarmed by the WoW switches is the ejection seat. Maybe that’s changed since I retired over 20 years ago.
And, yea…seems to me the pilot was pretty skilled, but in my 21 years of active duty in Naval Aviation Maintenance, I don’t recall a single mishap due to water in a hydraulic system. Our procedures for servicing hydraulics were extremely stringent for that very reason.
Yet, according to “Aerotime”
ONE THIRD???? WTF?
Apparently F-35 ground crews have never heard of “hydraulic patch tests”.
Seems to me our military is in need of a thorough housecleaning because it appears to currently have a significant number of incompetent boobs running things.
The Air Force’s hydraulic contamination ways are not Naval Aviation’s ways.
Water contamination in the strut (not the actuator) could be the result of failing seals on the strut.
WOW switches do not deactivate ejection seats typically; the crew may need to eject while on the ground (see last week’s story about the F-15 incentive flight gone wrong).
That’s a lot of water. The hydraulic fluid had to be milk white.
Couple gallons of Lucas stop leak coulda saved the seals.
When the rear differential seals failed in my old Nissan 4X4 truck (in fairness after 210K miles) it started sounding weird in the back end so I took it to the self repair shop on post and drained it. It was near liquid and very white. However, I caught in time and drove it another 60K miles before selling it.
I wonder if they still have those MWR shops on big posts? They were money savers for sure if you knew how to fix stuff. Doing your own work on a $500 brake job would save you $400.
They do. I’m fairly certain Fort Myer even had one when I was at McNair in the mid-2000s. It was in the old, converted warehouses the Fife and Drum Corps and thrift store. MWR calls them Auto Skills Centers, and I believe that most keep experienced mechanics/techs on hand who will provide advice and guidance for a small fee.
I never used them, since I always lived off post and generally had somewhere else to do my own work at. I did go to one to get rid of some used motor oil once or twice, though. Can’t remember if it was at Stewart, Benning, or while I was in training at Jackson.
Aaaah, lovely places!
Their wouldn’t be a problem if the AF base up in Alaska flew Brit Sopwith Camels and French Spads. No retractable wheels to wory about and I’m wheely giving you the skinny.
A little duck tape an some chewing gum coulda worked.
One third of the hydraulic fluid was water? The first thing that came to mind when I read the was sabotage. I may have missed it, but did they check the hydraulics in the rest of the squadron?
Yeahhhh that’s wayyyy past “contamination”.
Apparently their fuel was ok but I would give that a close
look as well.
Is the F-35’s hydraulic fluid hygroscopic, like brake fluid?
Is it just me or was calling the LM team and trying to work it out for several hours a good thing? I assume he wasn’t trying things the LM engineers discouraged.
“Violated procedure” is probably why that wasn’t clever.
Had he instead saved the aircraft, then probably “initiative”… “clever” … yaddayadda.