Is there terrorism in Obama World?

| January 31, 2010

For months we’ve had the discussion here about whether Carlos Bledsoe and Nidal Hasan were jihadist terrorists and I’m pretty sure the evidence is overwhelming. Most Americans are probably convinced of that fact. But in both cases, the feds have been unwilling to call it terrorism, let alone mention radical Islam in relation to the incidents. They are even reluctant to admit that Mr. Underwear Bomber is a terrorist. This morning, the Washington Times asks if the Obama Administration even knows terrorism exists at all;

It’s not clear what the Obama administration thinks terrorism is, if it thinks it exists at all. The administration doggedly maintains that political, especially jihadist, violence by individuals with no international linkage is not terrorism. This definition might come as a surprise to the Unabomber, who for years was the most sought-after terrorist in America.

President Obama’s knee-jerk response that the Christmas Day bombing plot was not terror-related was probably one of the factors that led Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab to be Mirandized quickly and treated as a criminal suspect. It shouldn’t matter that this was a domestic incident; he is a jihadist warrior, and the aircraft was his battlefield.

The other day, I wondered what Lloyd Woodson was planning. The Obama Administration denied that he was motivated by terrorism or Islam, but the Times says otherwise;

A report by the Northeast Intelligence Network reveals that, according to a member of New Jersey law enforcement, Mr. Woodson’s personal effects “not only associate him with ‘radical Islam,’ but also with a ‘militant Islamic group.’ ” But as the two cases mentioned above indicate, even this would not qualify him as a terrorist under the Obama administration’s narrow definition.

So, what will convince the Obama Administration that there are indeed domestic terrorists here (that don’t have right-wing leanings) and that we’re under attack?

Category: Barack Obama/Joe Biden, Terror War

11 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
NHSparky

After a year of this administration, I’m not so sure they’d even classify 9/11 as a terrorist act. But if some mouth-breather who served a year in JROTC in high school shoots someone, they’ll be all over the “right-wing terrorist supremacist” kick in about a millisecond.

UpNorth

Judging by their actions, I’d have to say that this cluster known as an administration wouldn’t know a terrorist if he stood on the WH lawn waving a flag that said terrorist. Unless, as Sparky said, he could be identified as a “right-wing terrorist supremacist”. Not. A. Clue.

AW1 Tim

NHSparky hits in the black.

These guys are Jimmy Carter Redux, and are as likely as not to get a whole bunch of folks killed because of it.

B Woodman

I’d say that the only way to get Obeyme to say “terrorist” is to have one actually attack the Red Shed — while he’s in it. And maybe not even that will qualify, in his alleged mind.

Robert "the infidel" Garding

Obama will admit to terrorists, but only if HE says the word. If anyone else says it, there are “no terrorists”. He is living in a double standard world that is right for him and his cronies, but not for anyone else who disagrees with his ideas. And his ideas, if he gets his way, will spread all over these “57” states. Hee hee.

dutch508

they cannot admit it was terrorism. if they do, then they have to admit they are wrong,and have been wrong for the last eight years.

proof

There is no terrorism, there is only “man made disasters”. One need only to look to the current administration for an example of a “man made disaster”.
I wonder if they cannot tell the difference?

UpNorth

SO, if Woodson had completed his jihad, he wouldn’t have been a terrorist, just a criminal? These people are delusional.

LL

Def’n of terrorism: the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce

Def’n of terrorist: a person, usually a member of a group, who uses or advocates terrorism

It’s that f’ing easy. They’re all word-retarded up there in DC.

JuniorAG

“The administration doggedly maintains that political, especially jihadist, violence by individuals with no international linkage is not terrorism.”

Ahem, here’s a clue Mr. President, Google “Col. Ulius Louis Amoss, Leaderless Resistance” and “lone wolf.”

defendUSA

And you know the Pretender in Chief cares more about the BCS stuff than he does the threat Iran has issued for February 11th. Anyone recognize that date? When the hell is this Shitcago thug going to start paying attention?