F-16 pilot’s widow sues AF over counterfeit ejection seat parts

| September 14, 2022

1st LT David Schmitz

We talked about Lieutenant David Schmitz a while back when he tragically died in an F-16 accident. You’ll recall he crashed while on a nighttime aerial refueling training exercise (his first ever AR operation for some reason). As we discussed earlier, there was a cascade of failures, any one of which might have saved the young pilot’s life. This culminated in Schmitz ejecting, but the seat failed.

Now Schmitz’s widow is suing over the faulty components in his ejection seat. Air Force Times has some of the details;

An Air Force investigation of a fatal fighter jet crash in 2020 quietly discovered that key components of the pilot’s ejection seat may have been counterfeit, Air Force Times has learned.

First Lt. David Schmitz, an F-16 Fighting Falcon pilot at South Carolina’s Shaw Air Force Base, died June 30, 2020, when his ejection seat malfunctioned as he tried to escape from a failed nighttime landing. He was 32.

The Air Force’s official inquiry in the months following the accident found that electronics inside the seat were scratched, unevenly sanded and showed otherwise shoddy craftsmanship.

That raised red flags at the Air Force Research Laboratory, which called for a closer look to confirm whether the pieces were fraudulent, according to previously unreported slides provided to Air Force Times. It’s unclear whether that question was ever answered.

While the Air Force suspected parts of the seat were counterfeit, it buried the information in a nonpublic section of its accident investigation report.

Those details have come to light in a federal civil lawsuit filed by Schmitz’s widow, Valerie, who is suing three defense companies for negligence and misleading the Air Force about the safety of their products.

“What the military does is inherently dangerous to begin with,” plaintiff attorney Jim Brauchle said Tuesday. “If you’re going to be engaging in that kind of activity, you want to be doing it with equipment that’s going to work.”

The case in U.S. District Court in South Carolina targets F-16 manufacturer Lockheed Martin; Collins Aerospace, which builds the ACES II ejection seat installed on planes across the Air Force; and multiple business units of Teledyne Technologies, which makes the seat’s digital recovery sequencer.

A sequencer is supposed to execute the steps of the ejection process when triggered in an emergency. Teledyne’s product is used in ejection seats on the F-15, F-16, F-22 and F-117 fighter jets, the A-10 attack plane, and B-1 and B-2 bombers around the world, according to its website.

In Schmitz’s case, the ejection seat shot 130 feet into the air but failed to deploy its parachute. The airman hit the ground about seven seconds later while still strapped into his seat. He died on impact.

These aircraft are equipped with what’s called a zero-zero ejection seat. They are designed to ensure pilot survival from zero altitude and zero airspeed. Previous generations required some altitude to successfully deploy the chute. The ACES II should have been able to save Lieutenant Schmitz as long as his canopy was pointed up, regardless of altitude.

Category: "Your Tax Dollars At Work", Air Force

17 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
KoB

In a just world, heads would roll at every level that was the cause of this tragic death. THAT won’t happen. The American Taxpayer will give the family a buncha money, the ones resposible will skate/never be known, and the LT will still be dead.

One thing I kept in mind during my service. Every piece of equipment I used was made by the lowest bidder

Sapper3307

Ordered from Amazon?
WTF OVER!

RCAF-CHAIRBORNE

Wish

ninja

Was taken back when reading this:

“ACC releases Accident Investigation Board Report for F-16 Crash at Shaw AFB”

https://www.acc.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/2409430/acc-releases-accident-investigation-board-report-for-f-16-crash-at-shaw-afb/

“The AIB determined the cause of the mishap was the pilot’s failure to correctly interpret the approach lighting system and identify the runway threshold during his first landing attempt, which resulted in a severely damaged landing gear.”

“The AIB president found two factors substantially contributed to the mishap: (a) the Supervisor of Flying chose not to consult the aircraft manufacturer, which resulted in the decision to attempt a cable arrestment in lieu of a controlled ejection and (b) a series of ejection seat malfunctions occurred, which resulted in the pilot impacting the ground while still in the ejection seat.”

“The cost of damages to government property was $25,016,107.”

How much is a human life worth?

7069.jpeg
Graybeard

May those responsible for this tragedy die a long, lingering, and painful death; with their guilt on loop-play in their heads.

Skivvy Stacker

There’s a wonderful Yiddish curse I like to use.
A zissen toyt zolstu hob’n – a trak mit tsucker zol dich ibberforen!”

Which translates to “May you have a sweet death-a truck full of sugar should run you down!”

NDHoosier

Calm down, everyone. The Air Force has limited resources, and it is far more important that everyone know the approved pronouns of the hour than making sure military equipment is safe. The lives of a few pilots are a small price to pay to prevent the alphabet bullies from being butthurt.

(Damn, even though that’s satire, I felt dirty typing that. I guess I know now what it’s like to think like Lars, and I don’t care for that.)

Mike B

I’m a retired USAF Aircrew Life Support/Aircrew Flight Equipment troop. It was our job to install the chutes on the ejection seats before egress took over doing that.

Back when I was in 86-08, this would have required a OTI (One Time Inspection), questionable seats would have been Green Tagged (Un-serviceable but Repairable), the aircraft Red Xed meaning no flying until repaired. Replacement parts would come down with an Emergency TCTO (Time Compliance Technical Order). Meaning seats must be repaired in X amount of days. Status must be reported to HQAF.

Now they just hide the shit, ignore it, play the blame game, what the fuck happened to accountability and taking pride in your job. I’ve ended a few troops careers over their pencil-whipping of Life Support Equipment inspections. These companies need to have their contracts terminated.

During my career I had 4 pilots eject all 4 survived. Our motto in Life Support “Your Life Is Our Business”.

AW1Ed

Navy Parachute Riggers were some of my favorite people in the squadron.

Mick

I’d still like to know who the assclowns were that thought that it’d be a good idea to send this young man out at night for his first look at the tanker.

No daytime AR training hops, but send him out to try it for the first time at night instead.

I have never heard of such idiocy.

Owen

I’m no pilot, but I’ve done dangerous things. As I recall, every dangerous thing I’ve done I practiced under controlled conditions and in daylight before doing it at night or in dark areas.

His first AR hop was at night. That just blows my mind.

Berliner

Perhaps the company executives periodically need to partake in a random blind test of the equipment they are providing just for verification of purpose and effectiveness. Depends optional.

David

Sort of like having parachute riggers jumping with chutes they packed.

SgtBob

“Built to military specs,” eh?

AW1Ed

Translate- Lowest Bidder.

timactual

“…the report said, and struggled to maintain the proper formation spacing and airspeed while following the instructor……but his F-16 struck the localizer antenna array that was located a little more than 1,000 feet before of the runway threshold.”

This “slightly above average” fighter pilot couldn’t fly formation with another fighter, much less formation with a tanker, and landed over 1,000 ft. short. I don’t think he belonged in an F-16 to begin with.

see pages 8-10 for description of landing procedures and picture & diagram of landing approach & lights.
https://www.afjag.af.mil/Portals/77/AIB-Reports/2020/June/F-16%20Mishap%20AIB%2030%20June%202020%20Shaw%20AFB%20(ACC).pdf

USAF_Rigger

As a former USAF parachute rigger guy, this kind of stuff burns me up. Granted we didn’t work on the seat with the exception of repacking the drogue chute but dammit you expect that thing to work when you pull the handle. I hope the widow of this young man brings the pain. USAF, you should be ashamed of the way you handled this for burying the faulty/counterfeit electronics part of this. Military leadership these days leaves something to be desired in my opinion. This behavior wasn’t typical of the USAF I remember serving in. Maybe I was just too young to see it back in the day.

I’m in a state now after reading this article and the earlier one.