The More We Practice to Deceive….

| October 5, 2020

This is worth however many minutes you can spare for it.  It is not a long interview.

The reason for waiting is at the end of the interview, in the last few minutes. It would be wise to put down whatever you like to throw at the TV, too. This has not yet come up in the lamestream media, but eventually will find its way there.

I always said we must be patient.

From Maria Bartiromo at Fox News on 10-4-2020, interviewing Rep. McCarthy:  It Was Whatshername…. The one who didn’t get her turn…. and Schiff was included in that, too.  You will have to be willing to wait for it to come up, so pay attention. And don’t throw things.

Fasten your seatbelts, kids. It’s gonna be a bumpy ride.

I do not know why I’m not surprised by this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=46im2EN5sYU

 

Category: 2020 Election, DC Government

Comments (16)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. went 3 minutes into it and hit the stop button. Other day there was how much the peeps in DC make which you had to hit the continue button to go through each pol. First one up was Trump and that he made $ 400,000.00 a year which is fake news since he turned the salary down. Hit the stop button and that was that.

    • Ex-PH2 says:

      Put your cursor on the “play” line at the bottom (it’s red) and move the red dot over to the right to about 7:00 minutes. That is where this reveal comes up.

      Try again, Jeff. It’s worth your time.

  2. NHSparky says:

    Our ancestors would be shooting by now.

    And Clinton, Schiff, Brennan, Corey, Strozk, Obama, and everyone else involved needs to do a perp walk.

  3. KoB says:

    I was very proud of myself. I watched the whole damn thing without throwing my laptop across the room. Having Kay Kitty resting her head on it prolly helped. She gets pissed when I disturb her purring and getting an under the chin scratch.

    HOLY, THIS IS WHAT WE HAVE BEEN SCREAMING FOR FOUR YEARS, BATMAN!!!!!!!

    Four phuqueing years pissed away. Been screeching lock her up, break out the ropes, tar and feathers, pitchforks, torches. Hang those mofos for sedition, treason, aiding and abetting. Skippy, and many of the rest of us, hoping that the lip service is over. This was prolly known to many others in grubmint when it happened. Now do your damn jobs!

    Here’s your evidence! Now do something about it!

    • Ex-PH2 says:

      I know. I was not surprised, just wondered what took so long to get the truth out. Who was blocking it? And why was it deemed classified? Now we know who was being “protected”, but don’t expect heads to roll right away.

      There is one more thing: despite the insistence that Clinton’s “personal” server was broken into pieces, I will not be surprised to find that some day, a duplicate turns up, and possibly more than one. But it will be when that old bat isn’t around any longer to threaten people.

  4. nobunny says:

    CNN is emphasizing that it is “unverified” intel then in the same breath says declassifying it endangers our country.

    • rgr769 says:

      Of course the Clinton News Network doesn’t want any of this exposed. They are part of the get Trump scheme. They were pushing the Russia RussIa!! Hoax for over three years. They don’t want the public to have their complicit lies confirmed. CNN would have to have the plotters, including the Hildabeast, confess before they would publish this info.

    • Ret_25X says:

      well, CNN only uses “anonymous” sources so that the sources and information cannot be verified by anyone.

      For the urinalists in America this is “verified information”.

      But when the source is identified…particularly if the source is a document, email, or phone record, it is “unverified” by which urinalists mean “true”.

  5. Ret_25X says:

    Isn’t it interesting that we have a political party that is completely unified around a set of lies and a political party that has fractured with the “nevers” siding with the lies.

    At this point, one might say that our two party system is no longer democrats and republicans, but the hoax party and the jobs party.

    Or to put it the way my dad always did…the fight in America is not left vs right, but workers vs moochers.

  6. OWB says:

    OK. I am confused.

    What about this is so shocking?? While the details were not all known by everyone, it’s not as if any of this is actually new info.

    Still, very glad that the details are coming out and that the evil doers are being exposed. Criminal cases will surely follow eventually.

  7. LC says:

    So, Clinton arranged the whole thing? Really? She managed to get FSB hackers to actually do it, orchestrating their actions at the highest level? That’s fucking amazing. Hillary Clinton usurped control of a foreign intelligence agency from Putin. Wow. God damn, someone with that level of savvy would surely be able to run a good campaign for President, right?

    Oh, and this also goes against what the SSCI says, and NSA and CIA says, but hey, let’s take Ratcliffe’s word. After all, he must be a life-long intelligence operative with the highest ideals and record behind him, out to expose this incredible, literally-unbelievable news, right? Oh,… wait,… he’s an attorney and a politician who rabidly support Trump. Huh, who knew?

    Would anyone convinced by this be equally convinced if a future Democrat installed, say, Michael Moore as DNI, and against the wishes of the IC, he released what was widely suspected to be Chinese propaganda that said Donald Trump and Tucker Carlson are willing Saudi agents? I hope not, because that would be laughable.

    Just because you want to believe something doesn’t make it true.

    • OWB says:

      LC, LC, LC. That last sentence is your most telling.

      A coupla things you should keep in mind.

      Some of us came up through a system which demanded that you follow evidence to it’s logical conclusion. Sure, along the way the hypothesis might change depending upon what looked most likely at the time, but the goal remained the same – look for and establish the truth of the situation, be it criminal activity, a scientific laboratory analysis of something, or the gathering of intel. Whatever the subject at hand, best guesses are necessary in order to allocate resources for the next steps toward the goal. And yes, those best guesses, based upon acknowledged to be limited information, are often wrong. Adjustments must be made at the time additional information emerges.

      That archaic model of what we used to call the scientific method has been in practice for a very long time. What you are describing is anything but that and not how I personally or anyone with whom I associate behaves. A “best guess” is very different from how one wishes something to conclude.

      In this particular case, the one about Clinton’s assorted illegal activities, it was obvious from the get go that she had personally engaged in and/or had knowledge of others doing so on her behalf. Comey confirmed that when he itemized all the elements of her security breeches at his presser which he wound up with the announcement that in spite of it all no charges would be filed against her and whoever acted for her.

      What Michael Moore has to do with any of this is only in your imagination aka a red herring. Can we base further discussion upon known information instead of wishful thinking?

    • rgr769 says:

      I suppose you won’t believe Brennan’s handwritten notes on his briefing of 0bama on the planned hoax to deflect the public from her email scandal, or the CIA memo to Comey et al re the same. Well, you just keep getting your info from Mikey Moore and CNN.

    • Ret_25X says:

      1. The DNC was never “hacked”. How do we know this? The DNC told us when they refused to have the “hack” investigated by the FBI.

      2. Yes, the Clintons were at that point in time able to get democrats to do almost anything.

      3. It is incorrect to assume that because a democrat appointee at SSCI, NSA, CIA, FBI, DHS says something that we are hearing either truth or fact. Appointees exist to protect their appointer’s interest…nothing more.

      4. You appear to assume that anyone who supports Trump is not be trusted. There is your logical fallacy and TDS tell. I suppose you must also believe that loyalist to Obama could never lie?

      5. Grow up. The swamp is real, the denizens really are stealing your country, and you really are the victim. Both parties are part of this and of the DC crowd, only the president is not part of the “in” crowd. This is why they hate him and demand you do as well. Wake up and smell the BS…it’s so strong that even flies are gagging in DC.

  8. Hack Stone says:

    I’m Hillary Clinton, and I approve this hoax.