The Truth About BLM’s Priority Goal
Mother Goose babysits her own brood and the rest of the flock
The truth about BLM comes from Fox News: https://www.foxnews.com/us/blm-deletes-page-disruption-nuclear-family
From the Fox article: Their priority is to destroy the “family group” – parents with children – but that paragraph has been removed from their mantra.
From the article: Users who tried to access the now-deleted “What We Believe” page on Monday were prompted with: “Page Not Found … Sorry, but the page you were trying to view does not exist.”
The page, still viewable on the “Wayback Machine,” listed the group’s radical objectives for transforming society.
“We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and ‘villages’ that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable,” one of those objectives reads.
The deleted page was first reported by The Washington Examiner. – article
The “western-prescribed nuclear family”? How convenient for BLM that they ignore the history and pre-history of H. Sapiens, in which the family/tribe grouping goes back further than H. Heidelbergensis, several hundred thousand years in the past. It is hardly “western-prescribed”. It exists in all mammalian species, and in fact, is true of ALL species on the planet (except maybe some insects). Even spiders have a sense of “family”; the females (frequently larger than the males) tend to carry their offspring on their backs until the little eight-leggers are big enough to fend for themselves. And then, watch out! They bite!
What a sad world these obnoxious jerks live in.
So, if you destroy the “western concept of family”, that makes you better than — what? Mosquitoes, perhaps? Cave crickets? Squirrels?
The idea that destroying the nuclear family, which is historically central to all cultures and all species, and NOT a “Western ideology”, will make things better is a road map to destroy civilization. Didn’t succeed in the Soviet Union. In China, the “1 child per family” rule has been changed to allow 2 children per family, but more than 2 means the “excess kids” won’t get schooling unless it’s at home, and so far, the Chinese government is not attempting to destroy families.
Category: BLM
Too bad they didn’t just go ahead and state what their true purpose is…The total destruction of the United States and the subjugation of ALL lighter skinned people everywhere. Odd that their FIRST 2 main heroes were basic street thugs that were killed by their own stupidity and became an inspiration for the pushing of a false narrative. The ability to place the blame for everything bad that has happened to them on others is a craft that has been honed for many years.
Larsie boi has been conspicuous in his absence lately? Is this post designed to draw him back out so he can scream that BLM and antifa are NOT organized? And that the mostly peaceful protests are a way of reparations for the legacy of slavery? And, ‘lest we forget…”ORANGE MAN BAD!”
The Black Race has no one but themselves and their ancestors to blame for their problems. They had major control over the entire continent of Africa for almost forever. Instead of using the vast natural resources available there, they made their trade and commerce the Human Slave Trade. Their Tribal Leaders made war on their neighbors, captured the same, and sold them as Slaves, thru their Muslim “Brothers”, to others all thruout the World. This trade and commerce was primarily broken up by the British Navy in the Early 1800s (the Slave Ships) and then the British Army (Remember the Zulu Wars?). Sadly this Slave Trade continues today. And sadly too, the Black “Tribal Leaders” (Think the Als, Jesses, Maxies, ect…) have continued to keep their own people in economic bondage on the demonrat plantation
Bring your bullsh^t on to Firebase Magnolia Bitches. You may take me out, eventually, but I will have a great number of you serving me in Valhalla as I drink my Mead from your skulls.
Locked and Loaded, Guns Laid and Fields of Fire are Cleared. We Have The High Ground Here.
No, it’s based on the article, which simply tells us what BLM has been up to, that’s all. It wasn’t any surprise, but the destruction of the family really started with LBJ’s crapazoid welfare program, which he used to get himself elected and nothing else.
This is 55/++ years later and look where we are now.
“Bring your bullsh^t on to Firebase Magnolia Bitches. You may take me out, eventually, but I will have a great number of you serving me in Valhalla as I drink my Mead from your skulls.
Locked and Loaded, Guns Laid and Fields of Fire are Cleared. We Have The High Ground Here.”
HEAR! HEAR!
Same-o same-o in my AO, my neighbors are locked and loaded as well and many can’t wait to keep score and see who bags the most!
Villages? I bet Hillary is all beside herself with the thought she can claim the origins of the tribal bullshit called “It Takes A Village”.
Well, if they want to go back to African or TeePee style living where every woman is your mother and every man is your father, they have a huge surprise coming.
In those societies, Chiefs ruled, supported by a council of elders. These folks believe in thei new order that everyone will be kind and share and there will be no crime and no need for police or Chiefs.
History and humanity has said no to that for as long as man has walked the earth. the strong and evil oppress, enslave and savage the weak. The strong and good try to help but history says, the two of strength always end in war, after war, after war. Unfortunately, good did not always triumph. And during the warring, the weak and helpless suffered even worse.
They can respraypaint this as many times as they want. It is nothing more than the notion that socialism can work. With perfect people using the perfect motives of their hearts, it could. But we do not live in a world of perfect people and altruism rarely if ever shows itself or its benefit.
More simply, this is the result of very wealthy people, far above what goes on. Some are unwitting accomplices but others are the puppet string holders. Their purpose is to destroy this and every other democracy and republic and control their own one world government.
Just my opinion folks but it adds up in my mind.
Well, if you recall, Sparks, it didn’t work in East Berlin or Eastern Germany.
Remember when Jonn Lilyea told us all about rescuing some poor soul who had climbed the razor wire strung for miles along the East/West German border?
If it’s so wonderful, why were people trying to get the hell out of East Berlin so often, never mind East Germany?
If socialism is so great, then where are the throngs of people risking their lives to escape to Cuba and Venezuela?
Lars?
(shhhhhhhh!)
It’s all about freeing the oppressed from the clutches of the evil white devil slave masters that have kept them down for years! I have the empirical evidence to show all of you! WE WILL PREVAIL!!!!
The same playbook is executed by terrorist organizations.
Take Hezbollah for example. In the 1980s when they came on the scene, they struck fear into the hearts of everyone that crossed their path. Eventually, they had to engrace themselves with the people and started doing reconstruction, built hospitals, became part of the parliament, become elected to higher political office, etc.
They then had a “tamer” image and this, in my opinion, spawned the emergence of Hamas – another group willing to get their hands bloody.
Lines from “Blood Diamond” about the state of Africa (but can be applied anywhere) —
So, everyone *thinks* they want to take over and be in charge, but nobody wants to govern the mess.
TIA :/
For all of their “lofty goals,” in the seven years since its creation BLM has raised over a billion dollars, but has yet to hold one neighborhood cleanup, send one poor black child to college, buy school supplies, feed the hungry or donate to a food bank, or provide housing to a single poor family. So, where is all this money going, other than to buying huge charter buses to transport their members to the next riot…..er, “peaceful protest?”
You are not allowed to use the word “riot,” according to the Associated Press (AP) style manual aka their Newspeak Dictionary. AP says that word has “racist” overtones; you should use the term “civil unrest” instead. I guess only Caucasians are capable of rioting; black and brown people engage in “mostly peaceful” civil unrest when they are burning, looting, and attacking LEO’s.
The white man behind BLM.
Hint Weather Underground.
https://youtu.be/Sq1m_PJtu5o
Who knew that there was a former Weather Underground domestic terrorist behind the founding of BLM. Everyone here needs to watch this U-tube video. Eric Mann (white male communist) is the mentor of the two founding Lesbianese Black women who founded the BLM organization. It’s actually a Marxist enemy of this country. Their admitted goal is the destruction of the nation and the creation of some Marxist utopia with them in charge.
The BLMers want their “villages” to raise children instead of a nuclear family with a father and a mother because it takes a village to raise an idiot–a very compliant idiot.
If anyone will recall, there were no families in George Orwell’s “1984.” There were no families in Huxley’s “Brave New World,” except for the ignorant and subjugated “Proles.” We also should remember that in every “socialist” totalitarian dictatorship this planet has experienced, the elites running it wanted the individual’s primary loyalty to be to the state and its regime, not to a family. The deconstruction or irrelevance of the nuclear family was a feature of each of them.
“We also should remember that in every ‘socialist’ totalitarian dictatorship this planet has experienced, the elites running it wanted the individual’s primary loyalty to be to the state and its regime, not to a family. The deconstruction or irrelevance of the nuclear family was a feature of each of them.”
The very definition of the term “totalitarian” yet the lefties say we on the right, promoting the essential value and necessity of the nuclear family, are the totalitarians.
As frequently demonstrated by our resident lefty, the Marxists always gets truth and reality ass-backwards.
You have to remember also that the “ideology first, family last” in those books was pure fiction, and the reality is that families were NOT frowned upon in the Soviet period at all. Yes, there were plenty of orphans, but that was owing to lousy medical services, not being separated from their families.
The only real control freak commie regimes that existed once Stalin was gone were the Commie East German government, Mao Tse-Tung’s communist regime, and the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia. China had a 1 child policy until just recently; now it’s 2 children per family. I don’t recall any other countries being that restrictive.
In regard to China’s Maoist regime, Mao Tse-Tung did not give a flying fart in space if people starved to death during the Great Famine (caused by a drought which took 10 years to end) because if 50 millions to 80 millions died of starvation, he had a population of over 1 billions to use, so why WOULD he care if they starved to death?
“The only real control freak commie regimes that existed once Stalin was gone were the Commie East German government, Mao Tse-Tung’s communist regime, and the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia.”
Cuba? North Korea? Romania? Bulgaria? Hungary?
All police states that demanded (some still do) loyalty to the state over family.
I also disagree that the Soviet Union didn’t promote the concept of loyalty to the state over family unity. It is a central tenet of all totalitarian states and the USSR was the textbook definition of totalitarian, especially under Stalin.
What is the source of your strong assertion, Ex?
They valued the family insomuch as it was a benefit to the state. Stout mothers bearing many children to the glory of the motherland.
Soviets and Nazis (both socialist groups that demanded party/state loyalty over family) even gave medals out to mothers who produced large families.
Cross of Honor of the German Mother
Order of Maternal Glory (USSR)
Mother Heroine (USSR)
Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union, not much difference between the two sides. Different flags (however, both prominently used red), different uniforms, similar setup. A large statist government in which speaking out against it was strictly forbidden, both made use of forced labor camps, and both had secret police organizations (the Nazis had the Gestapo and the Soviet Union of course had the KGB).
Part of it is that the hold the Communist governments had on those countries had nothing to do with destroying family unity, or anything to do with family, period.
It was suppression of the adult population by violent threat, such as the 1968 episode in Czechoslovakia and the 1956 uprising and suppression in Hungary. None of that had anything to do with family or children, in either instance.
The 1987 rebellion of Brașov was a revolt against Nicolae Ceaușescu’s economic policies, again having little to do with family. When the Iron Curtain finally fell, and journalists went to Romania, they found orphans who had been abandoned by their own families, suffering from extreme neglect. And there was no limit, as there is in China, to the number of children a family could have. It was whether or not those children were wanted, and they were not.
Cuba? Half the mechanics at my car dealership were Cuban. Excellent mechanics.
Maybe we should talk about Idi Amin DaDa? Certainly not a Communist, just a beastly disgusting slimeball who enjoyed killing off his own people. Or maybe the ongoing war in Ethiopia would be a good subject?
The point is that a dictatorship does not have to be Marxist or Communist. The ongoing war between warlords in Ethiopia is evidence of that.
Query: Is it destructive of family unity when you teach your Hitler Youth or your Young Pioneers to spy on and rat out their own parents to the secret police? (Inquiring for a friend who thinks he has a need to know.)
And that regime lasted how long? And how many Germans in the Army were actual Nazis?
Ex, from a Wikipedia article on Family in the Soviet Union:
“One year after the Bolsheviks took power, they ratified the 1918 Code on Marriage, the Family and Guardianship. The revolutionary jurists, led by Alexander Goikhbarg, adhered to the revolutionary principals of Marx, Engels, and Lenin when drafting the codes. Goikhbarg considered the nuclear family unit to be a necessary but transitive social arrangement that would quickly be phased out by the growing communal resources of the state and would eventually ‘wither away’. The jurists intended for the code to provide a temporary legal framework to maintain protections for women and children until a system of total communal support could be established.”
That certainly doesn’t sound like they were looking to preserve the nuclear family. In fact, it sounds remarkably like what BLM is seeking to accomplish.
And while the Soviet family codes changed several times, the ultimate goal of producing workers for the state never did.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_in_the_Soviet_Union
These basic Marxist principles regarding family have been followed to varying extent by every communist regime that has existed. That is not necessarily so of non-Marxist dictatorships such as existed in Japan, Spain, China, Argentina, Greece and all over the Middle East where attitudes toward the role of the nuclear family varied greatly.
Ex, I’m not trying to be argumentative but I do but I do believe your view of Marxist attitudes toward the nuclear family are a bit more sanguine than history warrants.
I was trying to make it clear that none of those regimes had any interest in family this or family that. They were ALL dictatorships, and cared less about destroying “family” than they did about finding excuses to put people into jail/coventry/camps than anything else. After WWI, there were more war orphans than there were parents of any kind. That comes from Solzhenytsin, not me, and he should have known, right?
Ex-PH2, I think you missed something important. Marxists redefine and remake things to fit their ideology. The “family” under Marxism is not the “nuclear family”. They may keep the name and some appearance, but it is collectivism by, for, and of the State.
They pervert and ruin every single thing. Their propaganda says otherwise. They “motte and baily” shamelessly.
Paying hollow honors to women who spawn large batches of drones is not “family”. Note also how badly that worked.
No, not a bit. As I said re: Romania, there were thousands of children abandoned to orphanages by their own parents, which was publicized when the so-called Iron Curtain fell and people from the US were allowed to go there. It was a hellhole. There were, in fact, more dead orphans than live ones.
East Germany was as bad or worse. And you know quite well that so-called Marxism is twaddle; the only thing it provides is an excuse to squelch the population into submission.
I don’t know why you think I’m glossing it over when I’m not.
BLM’s goal is simple; and “equal and just society” that they rule with an iron fist. No questions, no descent, no mercy, only obedience to their cult. Got it?
It doesn’t take a village to raise a child. It takes parents.
Villages raise idiots–whence the term…
And why Democrats think what produced them is cool.
The Seattle Mayor has now put her foot down! This after the “Summer of Love” as Mayor Durkin phrased the CHOP/CHAZ takeover of several city blocks and the “peaceful protests” and shootings and murders.
What has she done? She has pledged $100 million dollars to “Black, Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC) communities”.
Initially funding was from an increase in the business tax. She forgot a lot of business’ have shut down and leaving the city. Now she’s not sure which taxpayer pocket to pull it from.
That will teach them a lesson they’ll never forget!
Can’t she just hit up Bill Gates for some cash? Then he won’t be wasting it on vaccines and junk.
Orwell was on it in ’48… “unorthodox loyalties which can only lead to thoughtcrime”:
Orwell wrote “1984” thirty years after the Russian Revolution and the Marxist attitudes toward the nuclear family that were implemented there no doubt influenced this work.
From the 1950s to the 1990s many of the kibbutzes in Israel tried just this concept. The failure was so breathtakingly bad that these people voluntarily stopped doing it.
Where did this thinking come from you ask?
Former Soviet Jews who had escaped…err…emigrated to Israel. They were so ideologically brain washed they replicated the worst aspects of the USSR in Israel. This thinking still exists there, but it is no longer popular. Their children and grandchildren raised in these communal environments understand what was taken from them in the name of ideological purity.
Also, the family was not some arcane invention of the “west”. Even an idiot like Dummissar should be dimly aware that the family unit is the oldest polity in human history. But, I’m sure he has some bullsh*t academic talking point to spew on that.
Thanks for that reminder, 25X. Ol’ Poe’s old brain had forgotten that classic example of Marxist failure.
Even without the soul-crushing enforcing State, and fat hosts from which to draw sustenance, the Marxist efforts fail.
Look at their hippy communes here. After the usual lazy shots show up demanding to be fed for their sole contribution of political invective (hi Bernie!) The actual workers see the scam and quit, and then everyone else goes hungry and goes elsewhere to parasite. Sometimes they find a fat stupid rich fool to fund them. That isn’t “success” , it is becoming a fleshy houseplant. The moment the gardener ceases, it becomes a dead decoration in the dumpster.
Old Bernie stayed on a kibbutz for a little bit.
It flew the communist red flag with hammer and sickle not the Israeli flag. It let the the PLO know that we are on your side , attack the other kibbutz.
IIRC Bernie got BOOTED from that commune for being a parasite!
That was the Dog Mountain commune up here in Vermont, but he did get booted out.