Pelosi Goes SIBLDAM!

| September 20, 2020

Nancy Pelosi has arrows in her quiver to go with the bats in her belfry, it seems. She’s threatening to impeach President Trump a second time, because the first was such a stunning success, and Attorney General Barr to boot. That this is a blatant stalling tactic is obvious, with the hope of a Biden Presidency to name RBG’s replacement. It won’t be Biden making the pick, of course.
Then there’s the lame duck session between administrations if the Dems do prevail in the White House run. Joe will not yet have taken the oath, and Trump would is still be the Prez. Then what? For now, San Fran Nan is content to go Self Inflicted Bernathian Level Dumb Ass Move (SIBLDAM)* with impeachment threats. One can hardly wait for the Senate Confirmation Hearing, no matter who Trump picks. Anyone recall how well the Dems looked during the Kavanaugh hearings?
*Multiplier of 6. Thanks, Claw.

Skippy sends.

Pelosi Refuses To Rule Out Trump, Barr Impeachment To Disrupt Supreme Court Nomination


House Speaker Nancy Pelosi refused to rule out the possible impeachment of President Donald Trump and Attorney General William Barr in order to derail a Supreme Court nomination.

Pelosi spoke Sunday with ABC’s George Stephanopoulos on “This Week,” saying that Democrats would not be setting aside any of the “arrows in our quiver” going into the last days before the November 3 election.

Stephanopoulos asked Pelosi about the possibility that the Senate could attempt to push a nominee through in a lame duck session in the event that former Vice President Joe Biden won and the balance shifted in the Senate.

“So what can you do then? Some have mentioned the possibility, if they try to push through a nominee in a lame duck session that you and the House can move to impeach President Trump or Attorney General Barr as a way of stalling and preventing the Senate from acting on this nomination,” Stephanopoulos said.

“Well, we have our options. We have arrows in our quiver that I’m not about to discuss right now,” Pelosi replied, accusing Trump and “his henchmen” of saying that they would not accept the results of the election and adding that she believed that late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg would want them to prioritize protecting the integrity of the election.

Trump was elected, perhaps largely, on his potential picks for the Supreme Court. A third bite at that apple will play a huge factor in the upcoming election, and everyone knows it. Hang on Delta Whiskies and Whiskettes, it’s about to get interesting.
Read the entire article here: The Daily Caller

Thanks Claw and Skippy for the assist and the link.

Category: 2020 Election, Guest Link, SCOTUS

Comments (47)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. 2banana says:

    Impeachment for a perfectly legal constitutional decision she doesn’t agree with.

    That’s not what it is for.

    And all the rest of the democrats go along with it.

  2. AW1 Rod says:

    I’m wondering if one of the “arrows in the quiver” might be attempting to use something like Article 1, Section 5, Clause 4 of the Constitution to prevent the Senate from going into recess, thus preventing a recess appointment (assuming establishment RINOs won’t provide the votes necessary for outright confirmation).

  3. 5th/77th FA says:

    Yeah I been following all of the screeching since RGB went all RIP on us. What is so sickening is these domestic enemies of our Republic keep screeching about “preserving our Democracy”, “preserving the Constitution” ad nauseum. All of this is nothing but a smokescreen/delaying/braying tactic. The demonrats have no intention at all of Trump winning this upcoming election. This fix is setting in, they know how many votes they need, and you can rest assured the required number is already on faked ballots, ratholed in storage rooms, garages, and offices thru-out the land.

    I think we ought to have an in person voting, show your ID, vote, and get a colored thumb. Worked pretty well for the Iraqis. I honestly thought that I would never see what we are seeing in my lifetime. Four years of bull sh^t because that evil bitch didn’t get her turn.

    Lock and Load Boys and Girls…It’s a fixing to get real.

    • HtC says:

      “The demonrats have no intention at all of Trump winning this upcoming election.”

      I mean…that is generally how partisan elections work? I’m pretty sure most Republicans (Lincoln Project excluded) have no intention of Biden winning the election, either.

      • USMC Steve says:

        You missed some of the details there dude. One being the socialist democrats are situational ethicists, aka amoral scum. If it suits their needs/desires, then it cannot be wrong or illegal. They will try to steal the election. Just like they did with das Hildabeast. They are capable of absolutely anything, including political assassination.

        There are lots of passionate conservatives out there, but very few willing to go to those lengths to win.

        • HtC says:

          Ah yes, how well I recall Hillary Clinton’s dastardly actions to steal the 2016 election after the fact, when she [checks notes] congratulated Trump and conceded with 24 hours of the election.

          • Ex-PH2 says:

            And how you’ve conveniently forgotten that when votes were recounted in states like Michigan, ballots voting for Trump turned up and the recount stopped.

            • HtC says:

              So according to 5th/77th FA, ballots turning up out of the woodwork after an election will be how Democrats try to steal an election, yet somehow previously-uncounted Trump votes turning up during a recount is…also evidence of Democrats trying to steal an election?

            • Ex-PH2 says:

              If that does happen it will be nothing new. You should read up on Boss Tweed and how he ran things in New York during elections. Makes all these people on both sides look like pikers.

      • David says:

        The difference between a partisan election and what the Dems are doing is the difference between an ATM withdrawal and robbing the bank at gunpoint.

    • Fjardeson says:

      Love that idea 5th/77th. Show ID, paper ballot, dip your thumb in the inkwell. Simple, accurate, and recounts are possible. As a lifelong IT professional, I believe digital voting is evil… some things are too important to automate.

      • 5th/77th FA says:

        Tanks! Fjardeson…it ain’t rocket surgery.

        And Tanks! to the other weeds and weedettes that made a very spirited attempt to show HtC that reading for comprehension and studying past history is your friend. This is not the FIRST time that HtC has questioned my comments. Does this mean I have my very own troll fan? Should I feelz special? Do I have a single phuque to give about HtC’s opinion? Behold…my field of phuques…lo…it is barren and I have none to give.

        • HtC says:

          Nothing personal, 5th/77th – I didn’t even notice I’d commented on your posts multiple times. I just get annoyed when I read claims of election-stealing that are largely unsupported by evidence (I get annoyed when Democrats wail about it too, and lord knows they do). Didn’t mean to come off as a troll, and FWIW I agree with you that voting ought to be in person, with photo ID, with very few exceptions.

          • 5th/77th FA says:

            No harm no foul man. I have seen up close and personal “mail in voter” fraud. Got numerous compatriots that work for the USPS that have seen multiple ballots mailed from an address that they know is either 1 resident or filled with temporary workers.

            Sadly Georgia is as rife with this problem as any state. May have noticed a comment I’ve made where I watched people in the old cemeteries I’ve done clean up in, go around writing down names on absentee ballots. Recently, in the Atlanta area over 1,000 bogus ballots were uncovered, and sadly 150 some odd got counted as real. There is a very real and present danger, plus historical precedence in several counties near me that the total votes counted will exceed the total number of residents.

            Damn! I shorely was be hoping I had my very own resident troll. Isn’t that a sign that an inherwebz commenter has a following? 😛

  4. Claw says:

    For those waiting for a Whiz Wheel®™ Score, it spins up as:

    Nancy Patricia (nee D’Alesandro)(AKA San Fran Nan) Pelosi (SIBLDAM) 95 x 6 = 570.

  5. Sonny's Mom says:

    Check out Big Dan Rodimer’s campaign for Congress. He’s running for CA-12, Pelosi’s seat.

  6. A Proud Infidel®™ says:

    Malig-Nancy Pelosi is doing the bidding of her party agenda, namely doing all she can to prevent the appointment of a Supreme Court Justice that threatens Roe v. Wade which is probably THE most sacred Cow to the political left.

    • rgr769 says:

      I don’t believe they are all that focused on Roe v. Wade. Although it is one of their foremost sacred cows, it is only important because it rallies their female base. A reversal of Roe will not make abortion illegal. All the Blue states will have laws continuing to make abortion legal. Even some red states will refuse to pass laws making first and second trimester abortions illegal. But most, if not all, red states will restrict or bar third trimester abortions. Even the Roe decision does not question the right of states to bar third trimester abortions. Something most progs never knew or have forgotten.

    • Ex-PH2 says:

      I think you have it backwards, API. She IS the person who determines the party’s agenda, not the other way around. She is the epitome of the control freak and does not like to be opposed or ignored, both of which DTrump has handed her. Her grasp on running things is not slipping, but her unspeakable anger over being caught breaking the COVID19 ‘no special treatment – salons closed’ rule has generated a tempest of hatred in her that has been previously invisible.

      She got caught and she knows it and she is one pissed off beeyatch. If she practiced witchcraft, she’d be trying to put a curse on Trump (all curses backfire, BTW), but NOTHING IS WORKING to stop him, and she knows it. She does not know how to persuade her opponent to do what she wants.

      That’s what has her agitated. That’s why I said she’ll be found at her desk (after a lethal brain fart), staring straight ahead with that gavel clutched in her hand. She’ll be buried with it. No one will be able to pry it from her grip.

      I just wonder how high her BP has gone lately.

      One must show some concern for someone so inclined to spile and bittle.

  7. Skippy says:

    No Surprise here
    This is the reason for my negative state of mind on here concerning the DOJ
    And Barr dragging out the corruption Investigation that has been common place since Clinton at the DOJ and re-forced under Bush with out the knowledge of the idiot (Bush) or cabinet people,
    the cancer blossomed Again under Obama
    With purges that slowly ran out anyone with a once of integrity Left
    we should also remember Barr’s ass dragging is only making this worse
    The low info people need to be woken up, instead the foot dragging makes
    It look like the Durham investigation is a circus
    Does anyone on here understand why Barr is dragging his ass ????
    remember China is a main actor here with there money and influence
    And are no-longer hiding what they are doing the deal with TIk-TOK
    Is case in point by refusing to move they keep control
    And now have inside access to one of the largest government contractors
    Most people have never heard off… what a complete fucking circus
    Another Clinton giveaway like the spy-plane years back and and other
    Lightly reported events concerning sensitive military hardware
    oddly landing in the hands of the Chinese Military and the MSS
    what are the fucking odds of that ???

  8. The Other Whitey says:

    That desiccated bitch is panicking. It’s hilarious!

    • 26Limabeans says:

      Now that Ginsberg has actually died, Nancy realizes she may be just as mortal.
      She is in a panic to wrap up her legacy before Satan comes for her.
      The shock of a Trump landslide would be the final gasp.

      • Ret_25X says:

        her legacy is tightly woven at this point.

        Enemy of the constitution




        That’s some legacy!

    • Ex-PH2 says:

      Nancy has had so much botox poked into her mug that she’ll be found sitting at her desk, staring straight ahead, with that gavel firmly clutched in her grip…. and no one will be able to separate the gavel from her hand…. it will go to her grave with her…

      And a new era will dawn.

  9. USMC Steve says:

    There is ample precedent and evidence for her and several of the senior democrats to be charged and tried for Insurrection.

    Let’s see how they like being on the receiving end of the justice system for a change, this time because they actually committed the crime.

  10. Sapper3307 says:

    “What’s the pillow for.”
    RBG’s last words.

  11. Skippy says:

    She has definitely lost her FING Mind
    We’ll see if voters remember this in November

  12. AZRobert says:

    The voters will remember but it’s who counts the votes that matter.

    How many States recorder offices that handle votes have been compromised by soro’s snowflakes and other travelers over the years. Something funny is going on here in AZ and has been imho.

    Follow the money and the spider web enlarges.

    I’m glad God is in charge and there is an unseen realm and a book by that title too, may he have mercy on all.

    • Skippy says:

      I’m here in New Mexico
      Moved here two years ago from Arizona
      I’m in shock with what’s going on there
      Oddly no one I talk to admits to being a
      Leftist but oddly something odd is going on in the Phoenix area
      A shit load of dirty crap to

      • NHSparky says:

        If you don’t live in San Juan County you’re stuck in blue state hell in NM.

        And what’s worse, that bitch Lujan-Grisham is probably a shoo-in for reelection in 2022.

  13. Hack Stone says:

    Not all heroes wear capes. Hack just hopes that the man arrested for this political statement sues the District Attorney for San Francisco for selective prosecution, as when he assumed office, the DA said he would not have people arrested for urinating and defecating in public.

    • Ex-PH2 says:

      Can you explain to me, in words of one syllable or less, why anyone including that botox-laden bimbo needs more than one “vacay” home?

      It’s not quite like my uncle’s hunting cabin in the woods up north, where he took us out to find arrowheads and spear points and deer antlers, is it?

      Just tryin’ ta unnerstand here.

  14. 11B-Mailclerk says:

    Say, did Pelosi and associates tell Obama that the nomination should wait for the election or for the next president?

    No? Weird.