Justice Jackson has issues with concept of only biological women in female sports
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson took issue with the idea of having only biological women participate in female sports. Jackson described this concept as “overarching” and suggested that it excluded gender as seen by transgenders. Jackson appeared to imply that the “assigned gender” at birth concept denied opportunities for transgender “women” to participate in female sports.
From Daily Caller:
“You have the overarching classification, you know, everybody has to be, um, uh, play on the team that is the same as their sex at birth, um, but then you have a gender identity definition that is operating within that, meaning, a distinction, meaning that um, for, uh, cisgender girls they can play consistent with their gender identity, for transgender girls, they can’t,” said Jackson.
Jackson distinguishes between “sex” and “gender identity” as though the latter is a category deserving of equal consideration. “Gender identity” only means “a particular feeling I have about myself.” If that feeling leads one to make unreasonable demands, it is perfectly reasonable to toss those demands in the trash.
Williams countered Jackson, saying, “I think, if anything, that’s useful evidence as to the lack of a transgender-based discrimination, because if the legislature were just sort of unsettled by the notion of transgender athletes, I think the answer would’ve been to then bar them from –”
Jackson interrupted: “No, I appreciate that, I appreciate that, I guess I was getting at, the, um, what I understood the Chief Justice to be trying to resusce, which was, this notion that this is really just about the definition of, um, we accept that you can separate boys and girls, and we are now looking at the definition of a girl, and we’re saying only people who were, um, girl assigned at birth qualify.”
Again, no one is “assigned” a sex at birth. The doctor doesn’t spin a wheel and land on “girl” or “boy” or “none of the above” and proceed accordingly.
Jackson infamously refused to define the word “woman” in her confirmation hearing, when asked to do so by Republican Tennessee Sen. Marsha Blackburn.
“I’m not a biologist,” Jackson protested.
Additional Reading:
Sandoval, N. (2026, January 13). Justice Jackson outdoes herself with complete nonsense of an opinion. Daily Caller; Opinion. Link.
Category: Editorial, Get woke, LGBTQWERTY, Op-Ed, Society





The Supreme Court’s DEI hire speaks.
So now she’s suddenly a biologist?
Ask Jackson if she wants to get in the ring andt take repeated shots to the face from a man, a trans man, a trans woman, or a woman. She will suddenly know what’s what biologically-speaking.
She’s as much as an embecilic moronic dipshit as the person who appointed her to the bench.
Fucking embarrassment to anyone who studies or serves the law.
that was dirshit biden
Since she isn’t a biologist and has no idea what a woman is, how will she ensure the enforcement of such laws.
Ah, in response to the satire toon; for the brain dead people like that Commissar guy, girl? I’m also Not a biologist:
I have heard a number of agitators say that ICE can’t arrest US citizens. While not literally the dumbest thing I have ever heard it is pretty high up on the chain.
Quick suggestion, freely given, worth what it cost.
If all you trannies want to participate in sports, form your own Trans League.
Let the XX non-confused biological women play only against/with other non-confused XX biological women.
Let the XY non-confused biological men play only with/against other non-confused XY biological men.
All the rest of you, leave the non-confused XXs & XYs alone, form your own leagues.
There! Everyone happy now?
(why do I have to be the one to do all the mental heavy lifting around here?) (walks away, sighing, shaking head…)
the fault with the people that make up what to teach kids and have the teachers do the dirty work. not bad no typos with my still dilated eye balls execpt I cheated by enlarging the screen.
Big brains.
How far we have fallen.. such idiocy would have been laughed off as little as 10-20 yrs ago.. not this mental illness is taken as a serious discussion..