Paul Wickre: The internet is changing
Brought from this discussion.
Apparently, Mr. Wickre has a lot of time on his hands since he’s out of a job and he’s made it his life’s work to earn for Phillip Monkress his phony SEAL Trident. In fact, Wickre is “all in” in this endeavor. He’s been doing his homework and reading the incessant blather from Dallas Wittgenfeld, another internet bully who thought he could beat us and ended up losing everything that he cherished as well as his sanity. I think Paul is near that point, too;
All,
The Internet is changing from the the past five years when you tried to build your Alexa rank from nothing to under 250,000. You may have had a bump up but you still only get a few thousand subscribers, that buy into your hate and vitriol, as to your issues.
What I have found as you saw with HoneyComb in MN, is that the ISPs, carriers or hosting community, really do not like controversy. This controversy is generally known as hate speech, pornographic/mature, libel/ defamation, threats, incite to violence, conspiracy, spamming, altering page rank data, manipulation of third party content, abuse, threats, intimidation and so on.
What governs the industry, now is pretty much universal terms of use or terms of service. Your content is offensive as to any sensibility. Thus wherever you land or try and spew your diatribes against the Military Vets, or me a contractor, or the people whom you have singled out, my lawyers and myself have developed a template, well recognized as to your speech. Your speech, from your content is violent, sexual, threatening and just over the top.
Therefore we will continue to file complaints, as to your filthy content and let the ISP or hosting company be the judge as to whether or not your promoted content deserves to be in public.
We have reached out to multiple companies and your back up cloud hosting in particular. Maybe you win, maybe I win, but in every case I get you kicked off, it goes into a ‘Blacklist Industry” file.
I am pretty sure, that I will win the argument, and over time, regardless of any opposition you make say as to my family,, or the VA Community, the DOD, DHS, the fact that you are kicked off for your mean speech and tactics, will pretty much win the day. Anyway, I am a sporting man, and the bet is, that your vitriol over Stolen Valor, is judged the smaller Sin, vs. your language, speech and tactics.
OK Pardners?
Lets let the court of public opinion decide if your issue on Stolen Valor, trumps the numerous abominations as to Speech, Speech, Speech. Lets give it a year, and see who wins.
Remember this is about legal means and Court venue. Lets play there and see who trumps. I think if you were realistic, you would stop about the “threats” as your 3000 entries have been catalogued into really heinous things, like murder, rape, maiming, torture, S&M, accusations into every deviancy, you espoused. That “black” speech really has nothing to do with the issues at all, as to how you perceive an email, a phone call or a VPN address, as crying “foul” or a threat from me. You are just wrong here. I have 600 entries of the worst visual imagery ever known to the common discourse, from you. That is the issue.
Ok Lets see how you do, vs. what I think is right.
Best Regards,
—
Paul Wickre
VP DHS Business DevelopmentFirstTech, Inc.
Yeah, the email contained some of Wittgenfeld’s famous collages of me & TSO. What Mr. WIckre is admitting is that TAH is too strong-willed for him to defeat, so he’s going to bully someone else. He has no legal case, Monkress’ lawyer admits as much, so he resorts to childish bullying. He impersonates government officials regularly in his bullying. Someone tried to hack in into my Google Ads account yesterday, I guess to hijack that big $100/month those ads generate, but Google stopped him. And, oh, Wickre’s sister works for Google, by the way.
As TSO told us the other day, Wickre’s wife is his biggest enabler. Do you want to see the invitation to his “getting out of jail” party she sent to everyone?
I know Wickre is just a distraction from the big issue here, though; Phillip Dale Monkress is still a phony SEAL. Now that Monkress has been exposed as a phony, he is trying to scrub the internet from his false claims. He’s scrubbed the All-Points Logistics website and that leaves TAH and somehow that justifies harassing my wife and daughter and their friends. People who have nothing to do with this. I’m not ruining Monkress’ life, Monkress did that himself with his lies. And the original discussion about Monkress had been closed for six months before Wickre and Monkress renewed interest in it.
Well, anyway, I’m taking my only Maryland-legal rifle to the range today so, you guys have fun today.
Category: General Whackos, Shitbags
Just in case anyone here is a “do-it-yourself-er”: the Maryland Judiciary Case Search tool may be found at the following URL: http://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/inquiry/inquiry-index.jsp It appears to be a public utility, maintained by the Judiciary of the State of Maryland, that makes public record information concerning judicial records available to the public – as is required by Maryland Law. It’s also relatively self-explanatory and easy to use. Be advised that searches for a specific name often require an exact match; supplying more information narrows the search, but may result in incomplete results. The results of a search for “Firstname Lastname” may be different than “Firstname MI Lastname” and “Firstname Middlename Lastname”. In particular, the former often results in a set or results including the latter two. For common names, this can be an issue; for uncommon ones, not so much. However, you will still have to verify manually that all results refer to the same individual. This requires comparison of other information returned; however, information such as residence and/or DOB makes doing that feasible. As with any system of records, data entry errors are possible. For example: the year 1956 might on occasion be erroneously entered as “1965”. Therefore, using both DOB and residence as a cross-check is a good idea. Strangely enough, I don’t see any copyright notice on this search page regarding either the page itself or to results returned. I do, however, see the following in the “Terms, Conditions, and Limitations” one must accept to use the search tool (direct quote with emphasis added): “While much information is made available to the public through this site, some information may be restricted or require registration to obtain. All of the information collected at this site becomes a public record that may be subject to inspection and copying by members of the public, unless an exemption in law exists.” Additionally, the Rules Order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland governing access to these records makes no mention whatsoever of any copyright concerning this information. In fact, the term “copyright” would appear to be absent in the text of that Rules… Read more »