Update from Gitmo
Cross posted, remainder of post is on my actual home….
So I am posting this from Gitmo, and we are about midway of Day two on the hearings here for this week. Or, at least in terms of time. There are 33 seperate motions that the judge was hoping to hear arguments on, and dispense of these motions. Bear in mind that the actual trial isn’t even close to happening. This is preliminary motions on things like dealing with classified material, what documents will be admissable, how the defense attorneys can communicate with their clients and similiar type things. So far we’ve barely touched on two of those motions.
On Sunday night we got a chance to talk to the defense attorneys and the prosecutor. I have a videographer here with me (John Napolitano who is AWESOME) and he filmed them speaking. Just to give you some context on who the folks are, the lady is Cheryl Bormann, who is defense counsel for one of the AQ Defendants. (She is perhaps best known for her request that everyone in court wear a hijab.) The second gentleman is Navy Commander Walter Ruiz, another defense attorney. The general is Mark Martins, the chief prosecutor here, who’s background is astonishingly impressive. (Former Infantry officer, Rhodes scholar, Harvard Law Grad, and Obama classmate.)
So anyway, day 1 was…..fairly boring. It started with a series of people testifying about whether one of the accused (Mustafa al-Hawsawi) could speak English. My seat mate for these proceedings is a great dude from AP who wrote an article which I will cite in part, so you can get an idea:
Two U.S. federal agents on Monday defended their interrogation of a Guantanamo Bay prisoner accused of providing assistance to the Sept. 11 hijackers as a pretrial hearing resumed in the slowly unfolding war crimes proceedings for the five men charged in the attacks. […]
“He could stop the conversation at any time,” Stephen McClain, an agent with the Criminal Investigative Task Force, said under defense questioning. Later, he added: “He could leave the room at any time.”
McClain and veteran James Fitzgerald of the FBI were part of a group of agents dubbed the “clean team,” who were sent to Guantanamo Bay to question the lead suspects in the Sept. 11 attacks after the men were transferred to military custody after years of being held by the CIA overseas and subjected to harsh interrogations that would likely make their previous statements inadmissible in court.
You should go read Ben’s piece (CLICK HERE) since he’s an actual reporter, and not as prejudiced as I am. Nonetheless, I was unconvinced by any of the defenses arguments in this regard, the guy pretty obviously spoke enough English to know what was going on. I don’t find it credible that FBI and other government people interviewed (or interrogated if you prefer) Mr Hawsawi for four days when he couldn’t speak any English. If you’ve ever deployed and had to talk to someone who doesn’t speak English, it’s a frustrating and fruitless thing after about 5 mins, and yet they talked to him for in excess of 20 hours. But, the defense is entitled to do what they can. (As much as most of you would prefer to skip it all, the Constitution is clear that an accused gets his day in court.)
Category: Politics
The big questions is what color is TSO’s Beard’s burqa?
Don’t forget to scratch your nose when you catch the defendants’ eyes, TSO.
I request that you use only one finger, though. I’ll leave it up to you to choose which one.
I’m not in the courtroom today. I’m in the media view area that has the TV of what is going on. None of the defendants showed up today, and I am super hydrated and need to pee every 20 mins. So I am sitting here shooting the shit with the AP guy, and some Navy JAG from Boston.
@TSO.
Right on.
How is the chow?
Irish pub steak was good, the Guinness even better. Navy chow hall breakfast is edible, and only costs $2.50 so I have that going for me. Mostly I get lunch from Subway. (Some poor PFC is detailed to run and grab chow for me. I wish I knew how to thank him. Should have brougt some Ranger Up shirts to hand around.)
Do they have an Officer’s Club down there?
TSO- maybe you can essplain to us how the Constitution applies in their cases- these guys, not being US citizens, and not on US ‘soil’, how are they afforded Constitutional protections? I thought that was an entirely separate argument yet to be settled?
So, the Japanese and Germans got Constitutional protections? Sheesh- we could have forgone all those Nuremburg things, or those little meetings in Tokyo…
Is anyone talking US-based trials in there?
Wolf: short answer, because Congress said so. They built into the military commission act certain 6th amendment issues, and now they are fighting about the limits on those. In particular, the Gov’t is a bit schizophrenic on certain classifications. Granted, I am with the gov’t on the larger shit, but when one OCA guy says “this is classified” and the court says “you can tell your client this” and they are mutually exclusive, it does get somewhat complicated.
From a watcher’s standpoint though, today they keep referring to paragraph X of document Y when none of us have access to what it is they are talking about. Makes it a bit boring.
But no, no discussion of moving it elsewhere.
Why is being Obama’s classmate considered impressive?