Jeremy Kane Kimble and his crime spree
36-year-old Jeremy Kane Kimble went on a lark Monday in the York, South Carolina area. He began with a robbery of a Pride convenience store in York with a long gun and a mask. He robbed a West Main Discount and a China Garden gas station. A sheriff’s deputy caught up to him after that.
Kimble…has a past conviction for illegally carrying a machine gun or sawed-off shotgun as well as two drug and property crimes convictions…Kimble is a many-time convicted felon who has convictions dating back to 1997 and most recently was arrested in August for assault and battery, according to State Law Enforcement Division records. In the August arrest Kimble was released on a $1,000 bond.
As a convicted felon, Kimble is barred by state and federal law from possessing a gun.
Luckily, no one was injured Monday, but you have to wonder why he was out on $1000 bond as a repeat offender for at least 19 years and such a long and violent criminal record. And, oh, yeah, where’d he get a gun?
Category: Crime
Sometimes it is a bleeding-heart judge, and sometimes the laws are written in such a way that the judge doesn’t have much lee-way.
Usually I think the judge needs reprimanded.
All judges need to be tested for “intestinal fortitude” to see if they have the GUTS to throw the book at scum like this…most are pussies!!!
But…but…he’s a convicted felon, so it’s against the law for him to have a gun!
Somebody needs to do something! Do it for the children!
If it only saves one life!
Background checks of honest law abiding citizens would have stopped him.
The “deliverance” is strong in this one…good thing Ned Beatty was out of state during the spree
If we only passed a few more laws…damn the gun lobby! Damn the NRA!
Yeah, I’m channeling my HS friend there. Any gun crime can be laid directly at the feet of Wayne Lapierre, according to him. And dude has a PhD.
“a past conviction for illegally carrying a machine gun or sawed-off shotgun”
When you can’t tell the difference because they all look the same to “journalists”. Just call it an AR and go to print…
For this offense they fall under the same statute (16-23-230) so it would show that way on his rap sheet.
Thank you for the clarification!
More living proof gun bans don’t work
Cocksucker.
And then some.
Sounds like a copycat: http://www.mlive.com/news/ann-arbor/index.ssf/2016/10/report_clown-masked_suspect_in.html In that case (attempted bank robbery right up the street from me), the guy has felony convictions going back 18 years…
‘As a convicted felon, Kimble is barred by state and federal law from possessing a gun.’
Yeah, well, he must have done his shopping for gunnzzz in Chicago on the South Side in a railyard out-of-the-boxcar sale, or maybe in Englewood, because that’s where those gunnzzz dealers who steal gunnzzz and sell them are found.
Don’t believe me? Okay.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/ct-chicago-gun-theft-cargo-station-met-20150610-story.html
Not enough? Okay, here’s another one. This one’s supposed to be gang-related, but ain’t nobody talkin’ ’bout it.
http://www.fox32chicago.com/news/local/211783776-story
How much you wanna bet he’s a registered democrat?
If not before, he is now.
Headline:
As Baltimore police and prosecutors race to tamp down a sustained spike in violence, many of the charges against people caught with illegal guns aren’t sticking, or defendants are only jailed for a fraction of their sentence.
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/crime/bs-md-ci-gun-arrest-prosecutions-20161022-story.html
It would seem to follow that if you aren’t willing to enforce the laws when it comes to illegal possession of weapons, the only reason to make more laws is to confiscate weapons from law-abiding citizens and / or to make law abiding citizen criminals.in the eyes of the law.
You mean the NRA is right?
That it- make firearm possession by criminals illegaler. Stepping on the rights of honest citizens getting there is just bonus!
/sarc
It’ cuz’ he caught the PTSD.
I am thinking – 19 priors – release on probation. I would think this guy must be on some sort of probation, searchable or not. Would not this arrest be automatic violation or at least held on no-bail hold pending trial and probation revocation.