Cutting edge stuff

Some interesting stuff starting to take shape. The world we know now… I wonder how much of what is cutting edge now will be considered cutely quaint in a few years.
Starting off the show, Sweden is introducing what it describes as the world’s first 5th generation submarine. We know the F-35 fighter is 5th-gen, but a sub?
According to Saab, it’s because the new model, dubbed the Blekinge-class (A26) submarine, provides innovative capabilities that will “define the next era” in undersea vessels. Particularly, it offers next-gen designs, capabilities, availability and upgrades. Not only will it dominate the sea, but also the air and information domains thanks to its strong intelligence-gathering platform. It can also operate independently (autonomously) and in tandem with Saab’s other ocean drones.
Equipment and systems on board support intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) measures. In addition, it’s equipped with weapons to handle long-range strikes with modular design options, Saab’s SLWT full digital homing and wire-guided torpedoes, and seabed warfare opportunities. Above all, the A26 is meant to offer unprecedented stealth and low-signature features by minimizing most traditional signatures. When deep underwater, for example, it minimizes radiated noise, target echo strength, magnetic, hydrodynamic, and radar signatures.
Courtesy of Messrs. Bond and Clancy, we hear many of our subs can actually be quieter than the ocean around them, so the Swedes are approaching or surpassing – our standards?
In addition to being ultra-quiet and nearly invisible, thanks to a wide range of minimized signatures, Saab’s Stirling Air-Independent Propulsion (AIP) system allows the submarine to remain underwater for several weeks at a time. Usualhttps://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/sweden-revealed-worlds-first-5th-161700582.htmlly, diesel-electric subs must resurface after a few days, or break the surface with a snorkel, to replenish fresh atmospheric oxygen. But since AIP is “air independent,” subs using it do not need to surface as often. Saab also says it’s a more cost-effective technology versus other air-independent alternatives like fuel cells and nuclear power, because those are “highly complex and difficult to manage” and AIP is not.
Enhanced hull geometry, radar-absorbing coatings, shock resistance, and an electronic degaussing system provide extra stealth and protection. Meanwhile, the A26 can carry and deploy unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs) for special operations, as well as divers — think special ops — from its modular bays. That alone introduces new opportunities for undersea and seabed warfare. The modular design also allows for retrofitting when “technological breakthroughs” are made, so it can be actively modified and improved with “enhanced stealth, navigation, combat, comms and ship control capabilities.” Saab likens the modularity to past vessels, including the HMS Gotland and HMS Upland for Saab’s Gotland-class submarine. BGR
Think this is decades away? Poland is already buying three of these subs US News
Several weeks submerged with a non-nuclear powerplant. Wow.

Beijing-based Lingkong Tianxing has already flown its Yunxing prototype at Mach 4, the equivalent of 3,069MPH.
The company is hoping to launch a commercial maiden flight by 2027.
And over in China, similar projects are getting off the ground, so to speak.
Chinese aerospace giant Cormac has been developing a jet that would be quieter than a car when traveling at Mach 1. SuperCarBlondie

The aircraft, called Quantianhou or “Soaring Monkey,” is intended to compete in air travel with a speed reaching Mach-4, twice the speed of the legendary Concorde.
The Quantianhou prototype was recently unveiled in Chengdu, the capital of Sichuan province. Designed to operate in near-space, between 20 and 100 kilometers above the Earth’s surface, this aircraft seeks to improve speed, and test high-heat-resistant materials, advanced aerodynamics and cutting-edge power systems. The company plans to conduct its first test flight in 2026.
The Mach 4 Monkey plane(s) would make it from London to New York in about 90 minutes.

Then we have Venus Aerospace’s (Houston, TX) Stargazer:
Stargazer is designed to use a combination of rocket engines and jet engines.
Jet engines would only be used for take-off and then, once airborne at 170,000 feet (510 meters), rocket engines would deploy.SuperCarBlondie II
The eventual goal is level flight Mach 7. Call it London-New York in an hour.
Amazin’.
Category: None, Science and Technology





Didn’t we also used to have something similar back in the 60s-70s? The SR71 “Blackbird”?
May be time to bring the ones in mothballs out of retirement, and build a few more.
Mach 16? WTF?! Your Time Over Target would be measured in seconds.
“Almost there. Oops. And it’s gone”
https://youtu.be/jc8tu0ZPfEA?si=3LWlZk8reYm7K6iV
Ah, the classics.
My sister had a two cycle Saab back in the 60’s.
Had to mix oil with the gas.
They still doing that?
Had a coworker at Kadena that drove a 2 cycle car. He never really measured the mix properly, and more often than not, he looked like he took a second job as mosquito sprayer.
Are you Mike My dorm mate who had a Dihatsu?
The organization that I work for just finished a new facility to do research with scramjet technology. I’m thinking this is gonna be fun and interesting.
The abilities claimed are pretty impressive. Seeing if it is financially viable is another thing. The cost per seat has to be in something resembling a reasonable amount in order to have enough business to pay for a regular flight schedule.
Near Earth orbit altitude has been thought to be the best option for ultra high speed and avoidance of sonic boom issues but like I said above it has to be a low enough cost to allow for nearly full seats each flight to cover costs and rocket fuel ain’t cheap.
I’m not going to hold my breath waiting to see them place either of the craft into regular passenger service.
via some bubbleheads of my acquaintance the rumor is that the Ruskie diesel subs have managed to cloak their signatures pretty well.
The never-ending quest to have the better stuff so that the other guy can’t beat you.
“When deep underwater, for example, it minimizes radiated noise, target echo strength, magnetic, hydrodynamic, and radar signatures.”
Simply being underwater at ANY depth will “minimize” a RADAR signature.
Euro-diesel subs are world-class. Sweden’s HMS Gotland routinely kicked our ass in the early 2000’s and they’ve just gotten better.
170,000 feet is 51,816 meters.
That’s 51 clicks high!
The International Space Station is ~ 400 km high or 250 miles above Earth.
I have a hard time believing anything the Chicoms make public.
They are a bunch of retards that are obsessed with Sun Tzu, so if they published that information, I friggin guaranteed you this is disinformation to force us to expend our resources in pursuing a match 16 aircraft.
The Chinese can’t even copycat Russkie fighter jets that can stay in the air for long, they can’t build a jet engine that’s worth a damn either!
It’s a lot easier to build a quieter submarine when it is smaller and has a single mission of sinking other submarines or surface vessels.
We on the other hand like our multitasking submarines which are a little harder to hide.
I don’t care how quiet their subs are. Jonesy will find it.
Jonesy? Naw.
My non-nautical brain says that’s a definite “Aw Shit” moment.
Not to mention power projection. A diesel boat can be a nightmare close to their coast. Off ours? Not so likely.
Not so sure about that Sparky.. seems Donitz and his fleet of diesel U-Boots did a pretty bang up job along our coast back in the 40’s…