Dick Cheney attacks Donald Trump in Liz Cheney advertisement
Liz Cheney’s actions relative to Donald Trump have contributed to her poor polling numbers for her upcoming primary. Is this a good time for her campaign try to figure out what the voters are concerned about so that the campaign could try to improve her odds of winning the primary? Despite many Republican voters in Wyoming complaining about Liz Cheney not properly representing her constituents, Cheney’s campaign generated an advertisement featuring Dick Cheney.
From Fox News:
Former Vice President Dick Cheney calls former President Donald Trump a “coward” and argues that Rep. Liz Cheney of Wyoming is “fearless,” as he stars in the latest ad released by his daughter’s re-election campaign.
“In our nation’s 246-year history, there has never been an individual who is a greater threat to our republic than Donald Trump. He tried to steal the last election using lies and violence to keep himself in power after the voters had rejected him,” the elder Cheney says in the ad, which the younger Cheney started running on Thursday, a week and a half before she faces a Trump-endorsed challenger in the Republican congressional primary Wyoming’s single congressional seat.
“He is a coward. A real man wouldn’t lie to his supporters. He lost his election and he lost big. I know it, he knows it and deep down I think most Republicans know it,” the former vice president claims, as he points to Trump’s repeated unproven claims that his 2020 election loss to President Biden was due to massive voter fraud.
Liz Cheney was the most senior of the 10 House Republicans who voted to impeach Trump on a charge of inciting the deadly Jan. 6, 2021, storming of the U.S. Capitol. The attack was waged by right-wing extremists and other Trump supporters who aimed to disrupt congressional certification of Biden’s Electoral College victory in the 2020 election.
Fox News has the article here.
Category: 2022 Elections
I myself find it absolutely hilarious that the same people that were portraying this man as the devil incarnate 10-15 years ago, are now propping his words up like a new gospel of Jesus Christ.
Look, he was only the Devil because he stole an election that clearly Al Gore had won. Once the courts ruled Bush and Cheney had won all the Democrats calmed down and let it drop instead of continuously bringing it up every single day for 8 years.
or something like that…..
“all the Democrats calmed down and let it drop instead of continuously bringing it up every single day for 8 years.” BWAAAHHAHHHAAAHAAA!!! They are STILL talking about it.
They did the same thing with McCain. When he was criticizing Republicans he was the principled maverick of the senate. When he was running for Pres, he was evil again. Then he was great again when he was anti-Trump.
The Manchurian RINO…
now he’s dead.
It’s not a matter of what’s morally right or best for the country — it’s whatever is most convenient for their power grab and the treasonous push to destroy our country.
They hate when ordinary folks are doing well and at peace.
“He tried to steal the last election using lies and violence to keep himself in power after the voters had rejected him.”
I missed the part where this happened, but history is written by scum sucking, swamp dwelling, insiders that want to control every facet of existence, and after you die they get to rape your measly estate to zero.
What do we expect from someone who enriched Halliburton by manufacturing a war?
One of the common arguments advanced by the left, in the 2000s, was that the Iraq War was “manufactured” and “based on a lie”. Those who have heard the speeches that the Bush Administration advanced, or read the transcripts, and have read related literature regarding The Radical Islamist War to Exterminate Western Civilization and Other Non-Islamic Governments to Establish Global Islamic Law (GWOT was just our reaction), would understand why we had to go into Iraq.
We had a cease fire in effect with Iraq, which included provisions that required Iraq to come clean with its WMD program/weapons, something it immediately reneged on. This was not much of an issue to most until some guys based in the “boonies” in Afghanistan figured out how to slaughter thousands of lives on American soil using methods most did not envision could be used.
Under unrestricted warfare, which is what GWOT is, that threat had to be removed.
One of the intents of the Iraq War, on the heels of the beginning of the Afghanistan War, was to create a checkerboard pattern of different governing systems in the heart of the middle east. What the radicals originally intended was for us to get bogged down in Afghanistan in what would have been a much more bloody conflict had we not gone into Iraq. Going into the later shifted our enemy’s resources and efforts from Afghanistan into Iraq, allowing us to have two governments not under radical Islamic Law. This effort would contribute to the causing the sequence of events that would eventually lead to the Arab Spring.
Had the Obama Administration capitalized on the later, like what Bush Administration did with Central America, that region would have been “full speed ahead” with a political transformation similar to what happened in our own backyard. This was a part of the intent, mocked as the “ripple effect” that would not work.
I spent five years of my life in an Asian country. Although that continent has a wide variety of cultures and ways of doing things, there are some common undercurrent psychological/philosophical themes that run across that continent.
What I’m seeing with radical Islam (Taliban, Al Qaeda, et al.) is ominous for those of us who hope that American style governing philosophy would continue to prevail in the US. They are patient, and they intend to accomplish their objectives. We see things from a western standpoint, e.g., “Iraq Lie/Manufactured war” at our own peril. That’s the kind of thinking that has to occur for the other side to prevail and to get their global Islamic Law.
The cold hard reality is that we either change things over there, or they change the US and other countries into their version of radical Islamic law nations. There’s no third or other option. They’re willing to fight for years, decades, and centuries if necessary.
thebesig:
Thank You for sharing.
Having been personally and directly involved Before, During and After OIF (2002-2003), I have a complete different perspective on the Iraq Conflict.
20 years later, my perspectives have not changed. We should have not been there, i.e. invade Iraq. I knew from Day 1 that we were throwing our money away when we tried to “reconstruct” Iraq as well as Afghanistan. Iraq and Afghanistan are not Japan and Germany. A Christian Nation cannot culterally and economically change a Muslem Nation. I saw early on what was going on with Cheney and KBR/Halliburton. It turned me off.
I also suspected that George Walker had “Daddy Issues” and was trying to please/make George Herbert “happy”, i.e. get his approval.
I had to hold my nose when I voted for Bush/Cheney the 2nd time in 2004. Even though I started losing respect for both of them, I knew I did not want Lurch to become the next POTUS.
My personal opinions/two pennies.
Response to ninja, August 5, Part 1A
ninja: Having been personally and directly involved Before, During and After OIF (2002-2003),
My argument above is based partly on my personal involvement. I deployed to Iraq, once with the Navy and once with the Army. In both instances, I had access to organic, inorganic, direct, and indirect sources of information.
However, my perspectives are not just based on my having OIF experience, but on extensive study of literature related to the Middle East, specifically radical Islam. On top of that, my argument here is also based on over 4 decades of being a history buff, as well as having been a news junkie since August of 1982.
My assessment/argument on this topic resulted from a triangulation of the information obtained by the above.
Response to ninja, August 5, 2022, Part 2A
ninja: I have a complete different perspective on the Iraq Conflict.
Given that your perspective is consistent with the perspectives of the leftists that I have argued against over almost 19 years, on this topic, yes, your perspectives will be completely different from mine.
ninja: 20 years later, my perspectives have not changed.
Likewise, my perspectives over those nearly two decades have not changed either, no matter how many times I’ve heard your arguments presented either by you or by those that I have argued against in the past. What I argued above, and what I am arguing against you here, have been consistent over that time.
Besides, I don’t argue to change other people’s minds.
Response to ninja, August 5, 2022, Part 3A
ninja: We should have not been there, i.e. invade Iraq.
False, invading Iraq was the correct thing to do. Invading Iraq made perfect sense from a strategic, operational, and tactical standpoint. As I mentioned earlier, on this thread, Afghanistan was starting to become a quagmire. If we did not go into Iraq, we would have faced a bigger, tougher, deadlier, push back in Afghanistan. Afghanistan would have been much bloodier.
In this scenario, having bombarded Iraq since the Gulf War, we would not have had cooperation from Saddam. He would have supported the anti-American elements in Afghanistan just as other organizations in the Middle East would’ve done.
Response to ninja, August 5, 2022, Part 4A
You have to see organization in the Middle East from their perspective, and not from ours. Yes, the different Islamic groups may have differences in opinion about Islam’s direction, specifically with their manifest destiny of global Islamic law. However, they all have one common goal… The whole world being under Islam. They would much rather get along with each other when faced against a non-Islamic enemy.
Now, picture pulling out of Afghanistan like we did last year but much sooner. Not only would Afghanistan revert to what it was before we invaded, we still would’ve had Saddam Hussein working on his WMD program. This would have been much more urgent on Iraq’s part given Iran’s nuclear ambition.
I spent some time in Afghanistan as well…
☺️
Response to ninja, August 5, 2022, Part 5A
Meanwhile, one of the main reasons that Osama bin Laden aimed to attack American targets was that he was getting frustrated with not killing as many Americans overseas. The terrorist attacks of 9/11 were not to be the last. Given the trend of terrorist attacks to the approved, Osama bin Laden would have commissioned equal or deadlier attacks on US soil. Osama bin Laden’s intent was to destabilize the West in general, the United States in particular, and weaken our ability to interfere with Al Qaeda’s and the Taliban’s objective.
Even if Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden hated each other, they hated the United States more. Both saw the United States as a threat. Al Qaeda provided Saddam Hussein with “plausible deniability” should one Al Qaeda managed to get WMD across the US Southwest for use against the US population.
Thanks for sharing, thebesig!!
And who knows…I may be a “Leftist” (that is how you depict me, yes?) but that is OK!
Cause The Man was a “Leftist” as well…an “Outlaw”…So I take that as a Compliment!!!
And in the meantime, I still hold true that I no longer care for the Bush Dynasty (Thank Goodness they are becoming extinct just as the Kennedys, the Clintons, many others), that I will always uphold and defend the Constitution (WE THE PEOPLE!!), will continue to defend my Rights, embrace LIFE, not destroy it..and remain steadfast to gabn/gabaf/hbtd/rtr!!!
And my Flag…And my Country!!
😉😎
I did not call you a leftist but identified your argument on this thread as consistent with that of those advanced by the leftists.
No Jesus was not a leftist. He was a conservative. He did not change the meaning of the 10 Commandments and the other Old Testament commandments, he showcased them from a different angle. The themes that run throughout the Gospels run unchanged from Jewish scripture.
The Pharisees, Sadducees, lawyers, scribes, etc., had deviated from God’s commandments, they effectively broke the covenant with God. Like the leftists of today, they broke with conservativism to follow their own interpretation, one that benefited them.
Through Jesus, God’s covenant, including his commandments (law of the Spirit) were restored. This is conservativism, not leftism.
All this would be easier to read if the reply box wasn’t in a straight line. Bit c h over.
Response to ninja, August 5, 2022, Part 6A
This is scratching the surface unrestricted/asymmetrical warfare. Given this scenario, allowing Saddam Hussein to continue deceiving the United Nations regarding his WMD programs/weapons, and given the growing emboldened actions by the terrorists to conduct terrorism against Americans, allowing this scenario to continue was like being in a room full of flammable liquids with a man lighting matches.
Response to ninja, August 5, 2022, Part 7A
ninja: I knew from Day 1 that we were throwing our money away when we tried to “reconstruct” Iraq as well as Afghanistan. Iraq and Afghanistan are not Japan and Germany. A Christian Nation cannot culterally and economically change a Muslem Nation.
I’ve lost count of how many times I’ve had a leftist tell me the same thing. I will tell you the same thing that I told them… False!
From a historical standpoint, there were arguments against attempts to civilize the inhabitants of America’s newly acquired colonies. This included the Philippines. There were criticisms of American attempts to change the Filipinos, Cubans, Puerto Ricans, and other people’s and newly acquired territories.
I have had various Christianity faiths try to convince me that their Faith WAS the TRUE Faith…and everyone else was going to Hell.
These Faiths include the Jehovah Witness, the Latter Day Saints, the Church of Christ, the Catholic Church, the Southern Baptist Church, the Church of God, the Methodists, the Episcopal Church…on and on and on…
I studied each Faith’s history…and started asking serious questions to those who try to “convert” me…
For the record, I am Born Again and am not ashamed of my Faith. At the end of the day, I still respect other folks viewpoints, their beliefs, because I am not better than anyone else. I may not agree with other Faiths, but I still respect.
Luke 18: 9-14 has always been one of my favorite parables spoken by my favorite Outlaw…The Man himself.
😉
“Some say He was an outlaw, that He roamed across the land, with a band of unschooled ruffians and few old fishermen. No one knew just where He came from, or exactly what He’d done,
But they said it must be something bad that kept Him on the run.”
“Some say He was a poet, that He’d stand upon the hill…that His voice could calm an angry crowd and make the waves stand still..That He spoke in many parables that few could understand, but the people sat for hours just to listen to this man.”
“Some say a politician who spoke of being free, He was followed by the masses on the shores of Galilee.He spoke out against corruption and He bowed to no decree and they feared His strength and power so they nailed Him to a tree.”
“Some say He was a sorcerer, a man of mystery..He could walk upon the water, He could make a blind man see…that He conjured wine at weddings and did tricks with fish and bread, that He talked of being born again and raised people from the dead.”
“Some say He was the Son of God, a man above all men, that He came to be a servant and to set us free from sin…And that’s who I believe He is cause that’s what I believe…And I think we should get ready cause it’s time for us to leave..”☺️
According to the Gospels, he was not an outlaw. In fact, he broke no Jewish or Roman law. In addition to the 12 main disciples, Jesus had a following of thousands of disciples. They came from all walks of life. They knew where he came from, he’s referenced as “The Galilean”. They knew what he had done… It’s a big reason to why many followed him and, before he arrived at a destination, people would send word out so that they would have people near Jesus who needed to be cured or have evil spirits dispatched from them.
He was not on the run; though he had to hide when he sensed danger. He followed a path that he planned out. In fact, his last leg followed the path that major conquerors followed on their way to conquer Jerusalem. The bit about bowing before no decree, Jesus’s statement regarding paying taxes indicated that Jesus followed the law, God’s law, Jewish Law, and Roman Law.
My disagreement with your argument is not my “disrespecting” your viewpoint. People could disagree with each other and still understand each other’s arguments and still respect each other.
Sticking to one’s guns, because their argument is based on fact, is not the same thing as thinking that they and/or their opinions are better than anybody else. It’s not them attempting to exalt themselves above others.
The parable that you references addresses individuals seeing things from a pride/emotional standpoint rather than from a factual/Scriptural standpoint. Had the Pharisee understood scripture, he would not have issued that prayer assuming that he was righteous, and the other guy was a sinner… Elevating himself while lowering the other. The Pharisee would eventually get his comeuppance and would be brought down.
Response to ninja, August 5, 2022, Part 8A
The arguments against changing their cultures were not that different then as you and leftists made this century. These were different cultures, even though they were Christians, there were different cultural nuances and way of doing things within the societies that attempting to change the way they do things to adopt an American way of doing things was argued away in negative terms.
On Japan, a similar argument was advanced that we would not change Japan. People argued against our attempts to westernize that country given the culture that existed up through World War II.
But wait! There’s more!
Just as you, I have spent time in the Far East and the Middle East.
Also spent time in Germany…
Once upon the time, I was a Junior High School History Teacher…🙂
I spent time in the Far East, Middle East, Europe, South America, even Africa.
Once upon a time, make that a couple of different times, I handed a couple of history PhD types, one of them a university professor, their asses in debate. 😃
I am pretty open minded and listen/look at both sides.
At the end of the day, I respect other folk’s views. I may or may not agree with what they saw, how they feel, but I still respect their persectives.
😊
Response to ninja, August 5, 2022, Part 9A
Even many Germans resisted the Allied attempts to move them away from the culture they developed during the Nazi period, to one consistent with what the allies possessed. There was a German resistance that attempted to set up booby-traps along roads, including roadside bombs, aimed or Germans working with the allies. Not everybody wanted what the allies wanted to deliver there.
It’s easy, after the passage of time, to look at the sanitized version of history taught in school and think that we succeeded then where we are facing problems in similar situations in the 21st century. I read an article about how “America was losing the peace in Europe”. This article was written in 1946. Heck, the situation did not even look good for us in Western Europe in the years following World War II… There was a legitimate fear that we would lose Western Europe to communism.
Response to ninja, August 5, 2022, Part 10A
We were in the Philippines decades, and we are still in Puerto Rico. We still have troops and supporting infrastructure in Europe and Japan. You can’t possibly expect us to accomplish in a few years in Iraq and Afghanistan what took us over a century in Puerto Rico, nearly a half-century the Philippines with continued military presence for nearly a century there, with the continued presence in Japan and in Germany, and so on.
Perhaps we should have listened to the naysayers with regards to attempting to “civilize” natives to the islands that United States gained in the late 19th century, or with regard to Japan and Germany. The Filipinos and other groups, with regards to attempting to reconstruct Japan with a changed mindset, with regard to getting Germany to adopt something that the United States and Great Britain had practice doing for a long time.
Response to ninja, August 5, 2022, Part 11A
ninja: I saw early on what was going on with Cheney and KBR/Halliburton. It turned me off.
For someone who identified John Kerry as “Lurch”, you most certainly advanced the argument that his supporters advanced in the 2000’s. John Kerry was among those that argued the “Cheney/KBR/Halliburton” connection argument. John Kerry, and a leftist, insisted that Dick Cheney received money from Halliburton in exchange for contracts in Iraq.
Your insinuation had been debunked back then. According to Fox News, the money that Dick Cheney received from Halliburton was money that was due to him as a result of his services before he cut ties with them. Any money he received right after that, while he was in office, was money he was owed before he divested of them prior to his becoming vice president.
Link.
But wait! There’s more!
Response to ninja, August 5, 2022, Part 12A
When I started arguing this topic almost 19 years ago, one of my debate allies was somebody who was in Iraq, supply, trying to stand up a logistics system to support the US military.
The problem with getting other contractors besides Halliburton? Other companies did not want to make runs into Iraq. They could not find anybody, Halliburton was willing to step in. This was an issue of them not having other choice.
This individual was frustrated, and angry, with leftists persisting with arguments like yours. His frustration was such that he was willing to meet up with the opposition that still insisted the Haliburton nonsense, to introduce them with his 2 x 4.
Response to ninja, August 5, 2022, Part 13A
ninja: I also suspected that George Walker had “Daddy Issues” and was trying to please/make George Herbert “happy”, i.e. get his approval.
If that were the case, he would have invaded Iraq first. That was floated shortly after the September 11, 2001, attacks. George Bush rejected that. Additionally, he was willing to go along with diplomatic efforts to get Saddam to be compliant with coming clean with, and purging, his WMD programs and any associated weapons.
On top of that, Bush could have done something starting from the beginning of his first term. However, the first act he took was against Afghanistan shortly after the terrorist attacks. No, not “daddy issues”.
Response to ninja, August 5, 2022, Part 14A
ninja: I had to hold my nose when I voted for Bush/Cheney the 2nd time in 2004. Even though I started losing respect for both of them, I knew I did not want Lurch to become the next POTUS.
Did you? Your arguments are exactly like those advanced by leftists that I have argued against ever since I started arguing this issue in the 2000’s. The Kerry supporters consistently advanced your exact argument here.
ninja: My personal opinions/two pennies.
You owe me a penny and a fraction of the second penny. 😀
Little Ole ninja me does not “argue” with others”.
We share out personal perpectives/beliefs/ideas/viewpoints with others when others engage us.
We “Share”. “Enlighten”.
Today in Joey Boy’s Inflation times, two pennies are worth 1/100 of their worth or worse..
Thank You for comparing me to a “Leftist!” LOVE IT!
Remember: The Man was a “Leftist” as well!
An argument occurs when both sides disagree with each other. You started off by declaring that you have a different perspective. This lends itself to an argument, not sharing perspectives. You presented a rebuttal; I presented a counter rebuttal.
Now, had we been talking about something like running, swimming, or something else that we agreed on or similarly did, then the “different perspectives, ideas, etc.” comes into play. How I prepare for my runs may be different from your preparation and reading your commentary on your pre-run preparation may give me an idea of what to do with regards to my pre-run preparation.
That’s not what is going on with this thread.
Again, I identified your argument on this thread as consistent with that of the leftists. No, Jesus was not a leftist, I say that from having read the entire Bible, Old and New Testament. Jesus’s preaching conserved the intent of God’s commandments.
We have something in commom: We are both History Buffs!
😁
3 minute video of my favorite parable told by The Man:
Parable of the Tax Collector and the Pharisee Luke 18: 9-14
Enjoy! We Did! 😊
I’ve read the entire Bible, including the parable that you mentioned. Why would I watch the video for a parable that I’ve already read numerous times? To better understand a verse, chapter, or book in the Bible, you have to understand all the verses, chapters, and books that come before that, starting with Genesis.
thebesig:
That video is powerful. It was meant for everyone to see it. Sometimes, visual works better than reading. Ask anyone who has read ” Gone With The Wind” as well as watching the movie…😉
Thank You for exchanging your thoughts and views with us! As shared before, we learn alot from other folks perspectives.
The World would be a boring place if everyone thought alike.
Keep up the great work on your posts!
Unless the producer that created the visual has actually read the entire Bible, no amount of visual effects, visual wizardry, or visual immersion, will provide a greater understanding than that gained from reading a specific passage armed with knowledge of what occurred in the previous passages.
In every instance when I watched a movie after I read the novel, the movie fell short. Far more details, and greater understanding, was gained from the reading versus the movie itself. This is applicable in the Bible.
In fact, I went ahead and watched the video. It was not as you described, and more was not gained beyond the reading of Scripture. In the video, he calls Matthew. In Scripture, Matthew was already with him when he provided that parable. Jesus was not walking into a market area when he presented that parable. He was already talking to his disciples in an area containing people who intended to listen to what Jesus had to say.
On the Parable video:
We are all different…different on how we perceive life, books, movies, food, status quo, on and on and on.
That short clip moved me. It also has moved other folks that we have shared it with. I literally saw tears well up in some folks eyes when Matthew said “God, forgive me. I am a sinner.”
I know you are strong in your Faith. An admirable trait. I also know that you know that we are all not cut from the same piece of cloth. We come from different colors of cloth. We come from different sizes. Some pieces of cloth are used as rags. Others are used to cover and protect previous item.
The cloth is different. However, what we all have in common is that the same person, a Higher Deity, The Man, is The Cutter of those cloths.
Thank You again for sharing your thoughts and perspective! I’m very grateful that we live in a Free Country where you and I can exchange and express our feelings to one another.
God Is Good and His Son is Awesome…Amen??
The fact that we are all different with regards to experience, viewpoints, etc, is not what is up for argument. We are debating against each other, and even showed our difference regarding the above video before I posted my last response. No need to explain the differences, that’s a given.
When I watched the video, I saw why it moved you… Emotions. The clip presents the parable from an emotional standpoint where scripture presents it from an intellectual standpoint.
Herein lies a major difference between how you and I approach our debate on this thread. You are arguing and seeing things from an emotional standpoint. I’m seeing things from a fact, reason, and logic standpoint. The movie provides the emotional standpoint, scripture provides a logical/intellectual standpoint. For example, love in the Bible is presented from an intellectual standpoint. Loving God is done via the first through fourth commandments. Loving your neighbor is done via the fifth through 10th commandments.
Sin is falling short of God’s commandments. Faith in Christ, and believing in Christ, involves abiding by God’s commandments. I didn’t explain on this thread how I did that; hence the inapplicability of your statement about my faith. What I explained on this thread regarding scripture is not about my faith but about what scripture is talking about.
Hi, the besig!
Are you avoiding my question?
Will ask again:
God Is Good and His Son Is Awesome.
Amen?
P.S. Little Ole ninja me does not argue. I engage and exchange ideas and perspectives with those who engage with me.
Are We Having Fun? (2nd Question).
Cause Little Ole Me Is!!!
At least you are consistant!!
😉😎
First, your question is irrelevant to the debate that we are having. Asking questions like that is best done when we are not engaged in debate.
Second, why state the obvious? I’m not going to say, “Amen” to what you say because that is how your family, friends, and church does things. Those are practices of some denominations rather than scriptural understanding. With me, you have to explain how you see God as being good and how Jesus is awesome rather than simply state such. That is how I could see where your scriptural understanding is.
Third, as long as you and I are disagreeing on things, we are debating/arguing.
Fourth, yes, I’m having fun. I have fun arguing against others online, I otherwise would not be doing this for as long as I have if it were not fun. What’s even more fun is that those that I argue against reveal their apparent psychological profile the more they engage with me. 😀
I hereby dub thee St. Ninja of TAH, for miraculous patience and grace in the face of difficulty. 😉
Hi, LC!!!!
Thank You for the compliment!
I highly respect thebesig’s input…just as I respect yours and other TAH members.
As shared, I always enjoy readiing the exchange and bantor between you and our Poetrooper. I learn ALOT from BOTH of you. What is admirable and commendable is that you both are consistant in your thought process…in our eyes, that is a great trait. Consistancy.
Thank You again!! 😄
You have no leg to stand on designating someone a “saint” for “patience and grace”, when you’re not willing to provide others with a similar designation for having the patience to keep arguing against you.
The argument on this thread is but a drop in the bucket against the almost 19 years I’ve debated against others online.
😆😅🤣😂😆😅🤣😂😆😅😂😂!!!!
Only 19 years? That’s All?
Sheesh…What an Amateur!!!
😉😎
You’re cool, thebesig. Hope we have been good practice for you as well as providing you your “fix”..😇
Have a great Weekend…and remember:
The Man ROCKS!!
I’m off my meds, this is why I act like an ass. How else would I be stupid enough to flame someone who could edit my posts?
FIXED, show tact next time.
-thebesig
I used to like Cheney but then he had a daughter and she has
shown me the light. If only she could master the smirk.
I liked the way he manhandled Tim Kane during the 2016 debate- what a creepy weirdo!
The Delaware Doosh has not captured the market for dementia. To his credit, I doubt that Dick and his daughters spent any quality time in the shower.
I guess old Dick hasn’t grasped the fact that the VOTERS in that state are the ones that are about to shitcan his RINO daughter. Based upon his statements though, his version of reality dovetails much closer with that of the socialist democrats than it does to the facts.
Say g’night, Dick. Wyoming doesn’t like your daughter. And now, by extension, they don’t like you.
Maybe Dick Cheney should use some of the money George Soros paid him for his attack ad to attend a firearm safety course.
I do NOT recommend Shotgun Defensive TTPs by JR Biden Junior.
Dick Cheney (war criminal?) says he supports Trump on video.
GiGGGlZ
E7Tfi0FdheQ
I didn’t care what he said when he was “important” and I don’t care what he says now.
Phuque this two (2) faced, back stabbing, no shotgun handling POS of a sewer dwelling swamp kritter rat bastard. And use the Barbed Cock of Satan to do it with. To me he is a despicable epitome of said descriptive adjectives but also the epitome of the MIC that Ike warned us about. Kinda odd that during his 5 draft deferments his attitude was “I had other priorities in the 60s than military service.”, yet he had no problem sending American Boys and Girls into harms way all the while enriching himself. Slurping at the public trough since 1966, an elitist and bona fide member of the Deep State. And Mittens asshole buddy, too. ’nuff said!
Love Trump or hate Trump, he did start peeling back the layers showing the power mad despots that make up BOTH political parties of these States United. He was not their target, We, The People are. He was just in the way.
Anybody want to do the math on what the economy would be doing if Trump had of been sworn in for a 2nd term?
I don’t think that a man that helped lie to the country to orchestra an attack on Iraq, while clearly ignoring the growing problem in Afghanistan is qualified to comment on other peoples mores and ethics.
Same thing that I said above. The left argued that the Iraq War was orchestrated, manufactured, a lie, etc. That’s pure nonsense. The trail to Bin Laden went cold, and Afghanistan was beginning to turn into a quagmire before we invaded Iraq. Having a recent history with the Soviet Union, the intent was similar with dealing with the US.
Meanwhile, Saddam continued to violate the cease fire agreement that included a requirement that he comes clean with his WMD programs/weapons. He failed to do that in the 1990s, even kicking the inspectors out with no real major consequences. That started back up in the 2000s. Back in the 1990s, we did not anticipate that some “unsophisticated people” in Afghanistan were going figure out a way to slaughter thousands of people in the strongest nation on the planet.
Under unrestricted warfare/asymmetrical warfare, these two realities were like being in a room full of easily flammable liquids with a man playing with matches. We had to go in.
Leftists like to wrap their head around missiles with nuclear warheads, but WMDs include chemical agents, biological agents, and nuclear agents. Sarin, mustard, and blister agents were used in Iraq post invasion; hence, Iraq had WMD. Additionally, the New York Times published an article at the end of the first decade of the 21st Century reporting that the troops stumbled on a stockpile of WMD in Iraq.
WMD was just one dimension of the geostrategic realities facing us, the other was mindset. I explained above one of the intents of going into Iraq. It led to a chain of events that would lead to the Arab Spring. Going into Iraq also diverted the enemy’s attention and resources to Iraq, where we could leverage more of our toys in larger areas in the country to their disadvantage.
You know what? Fuck this guy and his whole fucking family. He needs to sit the fuck down and shut the fuck up. I move for a deployment of the AOI against this sack of shit. Can I get a “Second” or maybe even a “Segundo”?
Happily seconded
AYE!
I’ll drink to that!
What A Dick.
😉😎
Colonel Mustard Did It With A Candlestick In The Conservatory.
Dick Cheney Did It With A 28 Gauge Perrazi Shotgun On A Ranch.
I thought Colonel Mustard did it in the library with the maid…
😄 😅 😆 !!!
Someone should tell Liz and the other rinos that it’s not polite to flash your Dick in public
I spilled covefe, thanks…
That’s covfefe.
ROFLOL!!! Thx.
You’re both welcome, I aim to please
Bravo!!! 😜
I love it and this shit can’t get any better. Gee that sounds familiar. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Deadeye Dick takes aim at Trump, Trump’s RINOceroses hide protects him once again.
thebesig reminds me of the narrator in this short film video:
“As the story unfolds it becomes evident that the voice is a bloodthirsty bastard that wants nothing more than to see the people of the town kill each other in a needless gunfight.”
“The Gunfighter”
:wpds_wink: :wpds_razz: :wpds_cool: 😅 😂
You Go, thebesig!
You Are Hilarious!
XOXOXOXO,
the ninja family
You idiots loved him and baby Bush during the run up to the 20 year war. You broke it, you bought it. No going back ya dumb boomers.